Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1600360

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS

From Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS
Date 2017-03-14 14:30 +0100
Message-ID <tkUGv-Hf-55@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t6S1P-698-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6S1Q-698-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t75BM-7td-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdIqK-4Fw-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sebastien Bourdelin
<sebastien.bourdelin@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 05:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:

>>> +       gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(gpios->ndescs, gpios->desc, values);
>>
>> This can also fail and you should check the return code and print an error
>> message if it does.
>>
> As far as i understood, the "gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(...)"
> function doesn't return
> anything, it will return immediately if gpios->desc is null but nothing
> else.
> Did i miss something?

No I did, sorry about that.

We *should* make these functions return errors but currently they do not.

>> Error codes?
>>
> Same question here, these functions only make call to
> "gpiod_set_value_cansleep(...)",
> which as far as i understood doesn't return any error code.

Yeah, forget that.

>>> +               gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->csn, 1);
>>
>> Here too.
>>
> Same question, doesn't seem to have an error code.

That too.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 14:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-03-14 16:50 +0100

csiph-web