Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1598554

Re: [RFC/PATCH] of: Mark property::value as const

From Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC/PATCH] of: Mark property::value as const
Date 2017-03-12 07:30 +0100
Message-ID <tk5aV-60H-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <taBvr-43Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <teaGl-7ZC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Stephen,

On 02/23/17 15:08, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 02/13/17 18:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The 'blob' we pass into populate_properties() is marked as const,
>> but we cast that const away when we assign the result of
>> fdt_getprop_by_offset() to pp->value. Let's mark value as const
>> instead, so that code can't mistakenly write to the value of the
>> property that we've so far advertised as const.
> 
> Instead of struct property field value being a pointer into the
> FDT, I would rather copy the data to newly allocated memory and
> have value be a pointer to that memory.  This is required if we
> want to make /sys/firmware/fdt optional, which would allow us to
> free the memory containing the initial boot FDT.
> 
> I also do not want overlay live subtrees to have any pointers
> into the FDT that was used to populate the overlay, so copying
> the data solves that problem also.
> 
> 
>> Unfortunately, this exposes a problem with the fdt resolver code,
>> where we overwrite the value member of properties of phandles to
>> update them with their final value. Add a comment for now to
>> indicate where we're potentially writing over const data.
> 
> Yes, the resolver code needs to adjust phandle values.
> 
> I think I can get rid of the resolver modifying the various phandle
> values, and instead just modify the phandle value in struct
> device_node.  At the same time, I think I can also remove all
> instances of the phandle properties ('linux,phandle', 'ibm,phandle',
> 'phandle') in the live tree.  These properties should not be
> accessed directly by any code outside of the device tree framework
> since the phandle is located in the struct device_node.  A quick
> grep does not show any such accesses of the phandle properties,
> but I want to look more closely.

After reading through a bit of code, I am confident that I can
modify the resolver code to not modify the various phandle
property values.  There are a few tentacles reaching out to
other areas that I will have to fix also.  The biggest task
for me will be to create some good test code.

I'll be unavailable this week, so I'll start on it in about
a week.

-Frank

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC/PATCH] of: Mark property::value as const Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:30 +0100

csiph-web