Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #178522

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE?

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:58:25PM +0000, Joe wrote:

[...]

> A member of the sudo group has permanent root privileges. He might as
> well simply login as root every day, and not bother with another user.

Sorry, I've to disagree. It's a question of ergonomics. To some people
(may be not for you, and that's fine) it does make a difference to have
to invoke sudo and being prompted for a password (e.g. raise the level
of awareness, notice when an obscure app is trying to gain privileges,
whatever).

I switched from a su oriented setup to a sudo oriented setup many moons
ago and the ergonomy WorksForMe.

Stating things in as an absolute way as you did above is almost always
wrong. Or: All generalizations suck ;-)

> My understanding of the use of the sudo group was for multiple server
> admins, not workstation users.

Why that?

My only beef with the general exodus to sudo is that some (I think
the first was Ubuntu) thought you could do away with root password.
Until... you are in front of a box where the root file system check
failed and it prompts you for the root password for rescue. Sudo?
HAH.

Again: all absolutes are wrong, as I said :-)

regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli+aS8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbCEgCdFZOKtyuroWvHTKgJc1VZVNk6
sf0AnRpLBaAfOQGFbRkwJkTvo4ryBaC7
=BeJ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-27 10:30 +0100
  Re: Security hole in LXDE? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-02-27 11:00 +0100
    Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-27 11:20 +0100
      Re: Security hole in LXDE? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-27 16:40 +0100
      Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-03-02 11:50 +0100
        Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 12:40 +0100
          Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-03-02 13:20 +0100
            Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 14:20 +0100
              Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-03-02 14:40 +0100
                Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 21:20 +0100
              Re: Security hole in LXDE? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-02 15:10 +0100
                Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 21:40 +0100
      [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-03-06 18:30 +0100
        Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-06 19:40 +0100
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-03-06 19:50 +0100
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-06 20:00 +0100
              Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-03-06 20:40 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-06 21:00 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-06 21:50 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-06 22:00 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-07 09:10 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-03-06 22:00 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-07 09:10 +0100
                Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-03-07 13:10 +0100
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: Security hole in LXDE? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-06 20:50 +0100
  Re: Security hole in LXDE? Davor Balder <davor@cropakglobal.com> - 2017-02-27 11:10 +0100
    Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-27 11:30 +0100
      Re: Security hole in LXDE? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-27 12:20 +0100
        Re: Security hole in LXDE? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-02-27 23:00 +0100
          Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-28 11:10 +0100
            Re: Security hole in LXDE? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
          Re: Security hole in LXDE? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-28 13:40 +0100
            Re: Security hole in LXDE? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
              Re: Security hole in LXDE? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 01:00 +0100
    Re: Security hole in LXDE? cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2017-03-25 07:20 +0100
  Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-02-27 12:10 +0100
    Re: Security hole in LXDE? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-27 12:30 +0100
      Re: Security hole in LXDE? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-02-27 12:50 +0100
      Re: Security hole in LXDE? Pontus Goffe <goffe.pontus@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 15:50 +0100

csiph-web