Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #86630

Re: Never use strncpy!

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Never use strncpy!
Date 2022-09-26 17:47 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <tgth7s$3rvll$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <tgkc46$2hhg9$1@dont-email.me> <tgkeah$2hnjc$1@dont-email.me> <tgn3ri$309ud$1@dont-email.me> <tgrlov$1ctg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tgs31b$3nogl$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/26/2022 4:39 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On 26/09/2022 09:53, Juha Nieminen wrote:
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>>> There are a number of ways to implement atomics that are larger than a
>>> single bus operation can handle, or that involve multiple bus
>>> operations.  Different processor types have different solutions, and
>>> some are optimised or limited to particular setups (such as single
>>> writer, single processor, etc.).  Some processors can handle atomic
>>> accesses for sizes that are bigger than native C/C++ types (such as
>>> 128-bit accesses).  Some cannot handle atomic writes for the bigger
>>> native types.
>>
>> I think there's a bit of confusion here about what the term "atomic"
>> means. You seem to be talking about a concept of "atomic" with some kind
>> of meaning like "mutual exclusion supported by the CPU itself".
>>
> 
> No, that's not what I am saying.
> 
>> That's not what "atomic" means in general, when talking about
>> multithreaded programming. In general "atomic" merely means that the
>> resource in question can only be accessed by one thread at a time
>> (in other words, it implements some sort of mutual exclusion).
> 
> And that's not quite right either.
> 
> "Atomic" means that accesses are indivisible.  

Exactly.


> As many threads as you 
> want can read or write to the data at the same time - the defining 
> feature is that there is no possibility of a partial access succeeding.
[...]

Atomic to me, say a RMW sequence:

<pseudo-code>
________________________
int g_value = 0;

// A RMW operation
int
fetch_add_busted(
     int& origin,
) {
      int result = origin;
      origin = result + 1;
      return result;
}
________________________


Well, there are problems with this. Its not atomic, and can give garbage 
in multi-threaded environments... So, we can lock it up, using a hashed 
based mutex algorithm (hashing on address into a table of mutexes). I 
posted one in the past:

<pseudo-code>
________________________
int g_value = 0;

// A RMW operation
int
fetch_add(
     int& origin,
) {
      hash_lock(&origin);
      int result = origin;
      origin = result + 1;
      hash_unlock(&origin);
      return result;
}
________________________

Okay, we are atomic. There are other ways to get this done.

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/fetch_add

;^)

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-21 10:04 +0000
  Re: Never use strncpy! "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 15:06 +0200
  Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-21 15:24 +0200
    Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 15:30 +0200
      Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-21 19:20 +0200
        Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 19:33 +0200
          Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-21 23:14 +0200
            Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-22 04:40 +0200
              Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-22 08:56 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-22 12:02 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-23 13:23 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-23 13:49 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-23 15:25 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-23 16:03 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-23 14:34 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-09-23 08:19 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-23 17:57 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-23 18:36 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-24 16:22 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 16:25 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-24 17:09 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 17:14 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-26 17:34 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-26 07:53 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-26 10:21 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-26 08:34 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-26 13:39 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-26 17:47 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-27 14:17 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-27 18:07 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-27 12:42 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-28 09:32 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-28 13:34 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-28 21:11 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 06:26 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-10-01 17:01 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-10-02 15:32 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-10-03 14:01 +0000
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 13:49 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-02 12:46 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 04:14 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-02 19:43 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-02 19:48 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 04:53 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-02 19:58 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 08:27 +0200
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 13:49 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-04 10:53 -0700
                Re: Never use strncpy! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-02 12:44 -0700
            Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-22 05:59 +0000
              Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-22 09:32 +0200
    Re: Never use strncpy! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-21 15:42 +0000
      Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 18:10 +0200
        Re: Never use strncpy! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-21 16:19 +0000
          Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 18:27 +0200
            Re: Never use strncpy! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-23 14:47 +0000
      Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-21 16:12 +0000
    Re: Never use strncpy! Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-09-23 19:52 +0200
      Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-24 16:25 +0200
  Re: Never use strncpy! scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-09-21 14:00 +0000
    Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-22 06:03 +0000
      Re: Never use strncpy! Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-09-23 19:50 +0200
        Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-26 07:54 +0000
  Re: Never use strncpy! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-09-21 15:56 +0100
  Re: Never use strncpy! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-21 15:36 +0000
  Re: Never use strncpy! Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 08:59 -0700
  Re: Never use strncpy! Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-09-21 13:23 -0700
    Re: Never use strncpy! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-09-21 21:49 +0100
      Re: Never use strncpy! Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-09-21 19:18 -0400
        Re: Never use strncpy! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-09-22 00:39 +0100
          Re: Never use strncpy! Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-09-21 20:45 -0400
            Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 18:00 -0700
          Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 17:55 -0700
        Re: Never use strncpy! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-09-22 06:09 +0000
          Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-22 11:44 -0700
          Re: Never use strncpy! Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-09-22 23:33 -0400
      Re: Never use strncpy! Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-09-22 19:00 -0700
        Re: Never use strncpy! Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-09-22 19:04 -0700
          Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-22 22:49 -0700
    Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 11:38 +0200
      Re: Never use strncpy! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-24 09:43 +0000
        Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 11:59 +0200
      Re: Never use strncpy! Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-09-24 06:27 -0400
        Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 11:53 -0700
          Re: Never use strncpy! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 20:58 +0200
  Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 16:01 -0700
    Re: Never use strncpy! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-22 09:37 +0200
    Re: Never use strncpy! Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-10-01 01:24 +0200
      Re: Never use strncpy! Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-30 16:43 -0700
  Re: Never use strncpy! Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-09-22 21:03 -0500

csiph-web