Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #594719
| From | BCFD36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip |
| Date | 2022-08-29 13:14 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tej6n9$76h$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ba8aec6e-6317-4280-8262-33196e411534n@googlegroups.com> <ihkjghtvc70mubdat5tae8c4it74d2it3c@jwbrown.co.uk> <6b4b1d27-e083-4936-9a72-6cdee1a74fe2n@googlegroups.com> <rHCrI5.vyE@kithrup.com> <slrntgp4t3.137p.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> |
On 8/29/22 03:23, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2022-08-29, Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote: > >>> Whereas if it is labelled "Warning: ignites glass, sand, research chemists", >>> run really really fast.... :) >> >> (Hal Heydt) >> Sounds like the description of a Titanium fire. > > I think I've seen that quote or something very similar to it in one > of Derek Lowe's old "Things I Won't Work With" blog posts, and it > referred to either chlorine trifluoride, chlorine pentafluoride, > or elemental fluorine. > > Titanium fires are also nasty as I was told by a guy who was > supervising some chemical process--we have the world's largest > chemical plant in town--when a titanium heat exchanger carrying hot > nitric acid somehow caught fire and even the specially trained > company firefighters eventually gave up and just let it burn itself > out. > He was originally referring to F-O-O-F or F2O2, and then discussed many, many other things of dubious distinction. F2O2 seems to be so unstable that it will go off if you even look at it or possibly even think about it. It is worth giving him a read. Fires involving nasties: The only metal fires I ever responded to involved magnesium. We did not carry Class D extinguishers since they were so rarely used e.g. for me only 3 times in 28 years. I have a pretty good story about one of them I could supply if anyone is interested. Basically, our procedure for anything like that was to let the metal burn itself out while, if possible, keeping the surroundings cool. Titanium would be a rare fire indeed, especially for a rural department like us. EXCEPT, Lockheed has a test facility (Bonnydoon) nearby and sometimes drives trucks through carrying God-Knows-What besides rocket fuel and explosives. I found the following at https://www.ehs.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/docs/02-005CombustibleMetals.pdf Titanium: Specific gravity, 4.51; melting point, 3040°F (1670°C). At red heat, 1300°F (704°C), the metal actively decomposes steam. Following strong nitric acid treatment, the metal may explode by the light impact or friction of handling with tongs. The powder can be ignited in pure carbon dioxide above 1260°F (682°C), in nitrogen above 1475°F (801°C), and in air at 626°F (330°C) to 1094°F (590°C). Powdered titanium immersed in water or wet with water at ordinary temperatures has been ignited by chemical reaction. I saw molten steel and aluminum but nothing like titanium or any of the halogens on fire, except when my Chem professor at Cal threw a chunk of Sodium into a bowl of water. -- Dave Scruggs Captain, Boulder Creek Fire (Retired) Sr. Software Engineer - Stellar Solutions (Definitely Retired)
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-08-25 17:44 -0500
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip "artyw2@yahoo.com" <artyw2@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-25 18:07 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-08-25 21:15 -0500
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2022-08-25 19:20 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Peter Huebner <peter.huebner@gmail.com> - 2022-08-26 05:12 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2022-08-26 09:31 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip "pete...@gmail.com" <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2022-08-26 16:49 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Jerry Brown <jerry@jwbrown.co.uk.invalid> - 2022-08-27 09:14 +0100
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Jonathan Harston <jgh@mdfs.net> - 2022-08-28 15:57 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2022-08-29 01:15 +0000
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2022-08-28 22:06 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-08-29 10:23 +0000
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2022-08-29 15:30 +0000
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip BCFD36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> - 2022-08-29 13:14 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip BCFD36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> - 2022-08-29 13:27 -0700
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2022-08-30 04:26 +0000
Re: xkcd: Physics Safety Tip William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2022-08-26 12:13 -0700
csiph-web