Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2083109

Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No?

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:14:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<r25qfbthg9k3i2akf391hvnnq1or19qeci@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:38:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:26:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><5hvnfb1p0g8tma23idjtm12vr8308l1ru9@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:55:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:23:41 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><3hllfbh6h975h5hh6ovob6p6261j2o2rvo@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:45:43 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:24:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>><b78jfblpp1d7bkvuhr981k2s10putns3ro@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I obviously admit a human fetus exists.  It is not, however, a human
>>>>>>>>>>being and abortion is not murder.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now you sound like it's a human rat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A biological impossibility.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's what you keep telling us you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh?  Please give an exact reference to where I have ever said that.
>>>>>
>>>>>You said you were not a human being.  I suggested a rat then.
>>>>
>>>>Again. please give an exact reference where I said that.
>>>>
>>>>You certainly accuse me of saying a lot of things yet you seem to have
>>>>a problem in referencing where I said it.
>>>
>>>You said you were not a human being.
>
>>Prior to live birth that is correct.  And an acorn is not an oak tree
>>before it sprouts.
>
>It's not a tree, but it is an oak being developed   Just like an unborn child is
>a human being developed.

Nope.  "Being developed" is not even a term normally used in biology.

>
>>Any rat involvement was purely your idea,
>
>If you're not human, then a rat is a good choice.
>
The species involved never changes.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0400
  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:24 -0500
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:45 -0400
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:23 -0500
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:55 -0400
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:26 -0500
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:38 -0400
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:14 -0500
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:09 -0400
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:33 -0500
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:23 -0400
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 18:09 -0700

csiph-web