Re: New features added into C23 standard

From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: New features added into C23 standard
Date	2022-07-30 14:42 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<tc3903$3rs12$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<3093c98e-d014-47e4-bcf3-3f108d7c2c03n@googlegroups.com> <a500a595-29ee-47b2-a5c0-e725c76b5a39n@googlegroups.com> <fb562391-0bbe-488d-a89f-edc676e703b7n@googlegroups.com> <87mtcwzwt9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <40f5c874-ba25-4020-98a0-b6ce01b38dban@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 26/07/2022 00:51, Thiago Adams wrote:
> On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 6:50:41 PM UTC-3, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Thiago Adams <thiago...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:49:30 PM UTC-3, Thiago Adams wrote:
>>>> It's hard to believe how nullptr was accepted.
>>>> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3039.htm
>>>> The same for auto and constexpr.
>>>
>>> In 2018 I suggested nullptr
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/YJmom4rC2FI/m/DJzGmwXmCQAJ
>>>
>>> In 2019 I replied my own message saying that was a bad idea.
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/YJmom4rC2FI/m/Daz0AvxHAwAJ
>>>
>>> I agree with myself from 2019.
>>> "
>>> One difference between adding _Bool into the language is that BOOL
>>> was never added into the language headers. (Am I right? I didn't find
>>> BOOL or TRUE FALSE at the language specification).
>>>
>>> On the other hand if you search for NULL at the standard you will
>>> find that NULL is defined in stddef.h
>>>
>>> This means that adding _Bool didn't added a new way to declare booleans,
>>> but adding nullptr will create this confusion that is two ways of
>>> writing code that means NULL.
>>>
>>> In C we also have different ((void*)0) conversion rules compared with
>>> C++ that is more strict.
>>>
>>> Then for C, I believe that the literal that corresponds nullptr already
>>> exists and it is ((void*)0).
>>>
>>> What could be done is adding flags to static analysis to decide what
>>> to do with ((void*)0) conversions.
>>> "
>> I don't see the problem. There are already arbitrarily many ways to
>> write a null pointer constant in C. For example, '\0' '-'-'-', and
>> 0x0ULL are all null pointer constants.
>>
>> A null pointer constant can be of any integer type, or of type void*.
>>
>> Adding nullptr and nullptr_t adds one more form of null pointer
>> constant, and an unambiguous type for nullptr. Of course NULL and
>> (void*)0 are still valid, because invalidating them would break tons of
>> existing code -- but nullptr is the new preferred way to write a null
>> pointer constant. Old code is still valid, but new code can be cleaner
>> -- and if a user writes nullptr, there's no question that it was
>> *intended* to be a null pointer constant, which could result in clearer
>> diagnostic messages.
>>
>> (It's likely that if the language were being defined from scratch,
>> nullptr would be the *only* way to write a null pointer constant. The
>> stuff about using integer constant expressions exists only for backward
>> compatibility, and we're stuck with it.)
>>
> 
> I  cannot see any problem with (void*)  0.
> 
> Apparently this  was considered but I didn't found details about the problem.
> 
> "After WG14 refused a specification for a simple macro with value (void*)0, as well as a sophisticated
> version with an incomplete type and with a rewriting approach for many contexts, this new version tries
> a middle ground."
> 
> I never see anyone complaining or having bugs with NULL. And the original motivation
> for C++ was different.

As I see it, the point of "nullptr" is not because there is something 
wrong with NULL, 0, or "(void*) 0".  It is because "nullptr" is 
/better/, and gives you a clearer way to write your code, more 
opportunities for checking, and thus lower risk of errors in your code 
(for those that take advantage of the new feature and appropriate 
tools).  It does this without affecting existing code.

The key problem with null pointers in C code is that "0" is a null 
pointer as well as an integer constant.  So it's easy to mix up these 
very different purposes when writing or reading code.  (Let's be honest 
here - most null pointers in real code are written "0", not "NULL".)

If you get in the habit of using "nullptr" as your null pointer, that 
mixup is gone.  And your tools can check this, giving a warning whenever 
"0" is used in the context of a pointer.

"nullptr" is not as useful in C as it is in C++, since there is no 
function overloading and thus no need to determine if "foo(0)" meant an 
integer parameter or a pointer parameter, but it might still be handy 
with _Generic.

Thread

New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-22 12:32 -0700
  Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-22 23:15 +0100
  Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 01:31 -0700
    Re: New features added into C23 standard gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2022-07-23 10:10 +0000
  Re: New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 13:49 -0700
    Re: New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 13:57 -0700
      Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 14:50 -0700
        Re: New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 15:51 -0700
          Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 18:04 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 19:23 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Opus <ifonly@youknew.org> - 2022-07-26 05:13 +0200
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-25 23:36 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-07-25 21:52 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 11:44 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 11:39 -0700
          Re: New features added into C23 standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-07-30 14:42 +0200
            Re: New features added into C23 standard scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-30 15:18 +0000
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-30 09:13 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-30 17:31 +0100
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-30 16:46 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-30 14:36 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-30 18:15 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-07-30 23:28 +0000
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-31 16:48 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-31 22:42 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-31 23:25 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-08-01 00:10 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-01 09:55 +0200
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-08-01 20:17 +0100
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-07-30 23:21 +0000
        Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 22:59 -0700
          Re: New features added into C23 standard Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-26 00:48 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 02:08 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-26 06:59 -0400
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-26 04:02 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-29 21:18 +0100
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-29 16:55 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 11:51 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-07-31 11:12 +0200
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-31 07:40 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-31 17:40 +0100
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-31 12:56 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-31 19:28 +0100
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-31 14:52 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-31 21:35 +0100
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-15 23:24 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-31 16:57 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-31 16:55 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-31 20:09 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-15 22:52 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-16 09:21 +0200
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-08-16 09:32 +0200
                Re: New features added into C23 standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-16 11:06 +0200
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-15 23:17 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-08-17 20:11 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-08-17 20:08 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-08-17 23:19 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-08-18 07:03 +0000
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-23 09:43 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-08-23 11:02 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-23 13:40 -0700
          Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-26 07:04 -0400
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 05:24 -0700
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-26 22:30 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-29 00:02 +0100
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-28 21:20 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard William Ahern <william@25thandClement.com> - 2022-07-28 19:36 -0700
                Re: New features added into C23 standard scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-29 16:39 +0000
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-29 18:55 -0400
                Re: New features added into C23 standard Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-29 15:17 +0100
          Re: New features added into C23 standard scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-26 13:27 +0000
          Re: New features added into C23 standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 11:47 -0700
            Re: New features added into C23 standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-07-26 20:27 +0000
              Re: New features added into C23 standard Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-08-16 08:42 +0200
  Re: New features added into C23 standard Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 05:37 +0200
    Re: New features added into C23 standard Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-07-28 16:47 -0500
      Re: New features added into C23 standard Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-29 07:14 +0200
        Re: New features added into C23 standard Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-29 21:21 +0100
  Re: New features added into C23 standard Grant Mulholland <grantlmul@gmail.com> - 2022-08-13 22:21 -0700
    Re: New features added into C23 standard Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-08-15 21:21 -0500
      Re: New features added into C23 standard Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-08-16 08:39 +0200
    Re: New features added into C23 standard Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-08-15 22:54 -0700
    Re: New features added into C23 standard Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-08-18 12:03 -0700
      Re: New features added into C23 standard "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-08-18 12:56 -0700
      Re: New features added into C23 standard William Ahern <william@25thandClement.com> - 2022-08-18 16:07 -0700
        Re: New features added into C23 standard Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-08-18 18:47 -0700
          Re: New features added into C23 standard Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-08-18 20:23 -0700

csiph-web