Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1583734
| From | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount |
| Date | 2017-02-17 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tbXDA-DC-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <t7e2l-4XW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbewO-4G5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbwDn-8mJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbGW5-6FB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbUFH-7gh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:34:07AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 02:55 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:56:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi James,
> > > >
> > > > Should it be "return d_splice_alias()" so that if we find an
> > > > alias it is returned back to caller and passed in dentry can be
> > > > freed. Though I don't know in what cases alias can be found. And
> > > > if alias is found how do we make sure alias_dentry->d_fsdata is
> > > > pointing to new (real dentry).
> > >
> > > It probably should be for the sake of the pattern. In our case I
> > > don't think we can have any root aliases because the root dentry is
> > > always pinned in the cache, so cache lookup should always find it.
> >
> > What does that have to do with root dentry? The real reason why that
> > code works (FVerySVO) is that the damn thing allocates a new inode
> > every time. Including the hardlinks, BTW.
>
> Yes, this is a known characteristic of stacked filesystems. Is there
> some magic I don't know about that would make it easier to reflect hard
> links as aliases?
I think overlayfs had the same issue in the beginning and miklos fixed it.
commit 51f7e52dc943468c6929fa0a82d4afac3c8e9636
Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Jul 29 12:05:24 2016 +0200
ovl: share inode for hard link
Vivek
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2017-02-15 21:40 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-16 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-02-17 04:00 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-17 18:40 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2017-02-17 21:50 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-19 04:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2017-02-20 20:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-02-21 01:40 +0100
csiph-web