Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #166629
| From | Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" |
| Date | 2022-07-11 00:44 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tagdbc$mlb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
"C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language"
https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/23/c_not_a_language/
"Aria Beingessner, a member of the teams that implemented both Rust and
Swift, has an interesting take on some of those (and other) language's
problems – that C isn't a programming language anymore."
"There are many problems with the C language. To pick just a few: it can
be difficult to parse; there are competing and subtly incompatible
variants; and then there are the complex ways C defines and handles
integers and other variables."
"For instance, after much deliberation, a bunch of companies called the
Aspen Group settled on a programming model for 64-bit Unix and Unix-like
OSes called LP64, also known as "4/8/8". Unfortunately, 64-bit Microsoft
Windows uses a different model, called LLP64 or "4/4/8"."
https://techmonitor.ai/technology/aspen_group_hands_over_specification_proposals_overspill_to_xopen_will_implement_common_64_bit
and
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Win64
"And that's before the issues around intmax_t, which the C99 standard
defines as "a signed integer type capable of representing any value of
any signed integer type." As software engineer JeanHeyd Meneide pointed
out, this gets complicated.
https://thephd.dev/intmax_t-hell-c++-c
Lynn
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 00:44 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 09:33 +0200
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 00:58 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 15:39 +0200
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> - 2022-07-11 14:17 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-11 14:38 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 10:48 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-11 20:59 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 03:28 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 14:24 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-11 12:40 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 19:34 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-12 12:33 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Albert Arkwright <Albert.Arkwright@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 22:13 +0100
H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-11 18:14 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Freethinker <freethinker@mymail.com> - 2022-07-12 16:14 +0200
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 20:49 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-12 22:26 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 21:29 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-12 22:39 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 21:52 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 07:51 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 07:19 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-07-13 18:27 +0100
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 19:51 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 19:06 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 21:20 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 20:34 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 21:55 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 21:08 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 22:21 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 21:55 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-07-14 05:18 +0100
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 23:27 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-07-14 07:53 +0100
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-14 05:43 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-14 07:08 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-07-14 16:06 +0000
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 23:29 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-07-14 07:52 +0100
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-14 05:49 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-14 07:12 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-07-14 17:48 +0100
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-14 07:07 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) - 2022-07-18 17:51 +0300
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 22:29 -0400
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 19:41 -0700
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Jens Schweikhardt <usenet@schweikhardt.net> - 2022-07-13 21:08 +0000
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 19:33 -0500
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem Freethinker <freethinker@mymail.com> - 2022-07-14 23:46 +0200
Re: H(P,P) is pure software engineering that correctly refutes the halting theorem olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-14 17:04 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-12 09:52 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-12 11:27 +0100
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 13:01 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-12 22:19 +0100
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" [Olcott] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 21:04 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-13 10:02 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-07-13 15:24 +0000
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-13 19:00 +0100
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 15:31 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 14:29 +0200
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 14:46 +0200
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 07:48 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-12 21:45 -0400
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 08:18 +0200
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 07:45 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-12 21:39 -0400
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 07:45 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 02:56 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 11:01 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 13:54 -0500
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 01:13 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 10:23 -0700
Re: "C: Everyone's favourite programming language isn't a programming language" pure SE - Olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 11:25 -0700
csiph-web