Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1676764
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 01/52] genirq: Let irq_set_vcpu_affinity() iterate over hierarchy |
| Date | 2017-06-28 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tXmLn-8q5-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tXmLn-8q5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
When assigning an interrupt to a vcpu, it is not unlikely that
the level of the hierarchy implementing irq_set_vcpu_affinity
is not the top level (think a generic MSI domain on top of a
virtualization aware interrupt controller).
In such a case, let's iterate over the hierarchy until we find
an irqchip implementing it.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 425170d4439b..804fb94e86e6 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -431,8 +431,18 @@ int irq_set_vcpu_affinity(unsigned int irq, void *vcpu_info)
return -EINVAL;
data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
- chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
- if (chip && chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity)
+ do {
+ chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
+ if (chip && chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity)
+ break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
+ data = data->parent_data;
+#else
+ data = NULL;
+#endif
+ } while (data);
+
+ if (data)
ret = chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity(data, vcpu_info);
irq_put_desc_unlock(desc, flags);
--
2.11.0
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 01/52] genirq: Let irq_set_vcpu_affinity() iterate over hierarchy Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-06-28 17:10 +0200
csiph-web