Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1671368
| From | Bhushan Shah <bshah@kde.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F |
| Date | 2017-06-21 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUGwV-1WC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
In the lm3630a_chip_init we try to write to 0x50 register, which is
higher value then the max_register value, this resulted in regmap_write
return -EIO.
Fix this by bumping REG_MAX value to 0x50.
Signed-off-by: Bhushan Shah <bshah@kde.org>
Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
index 60d6c2ac87aa..42496b6c09d0 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@
#define REG_FAULT 0x0B
#define REG_PWM_OUTLOW 0x12
#define REG_PWM_OUTHIGH 0x13
-#define REG_MAX 0x1F
+#define REG_FLTR_STR 0x50
+#define REG_MAX 0x50
#define INT_DEBOUNCE_MSEC 10
struct lm3630a_chip {
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ static int lm3630a_chip_init(struct lm3630a_chip *pchip)
usleep_range(1000, 2000);
/* set Filter Strength Register */
- rval = lm3630a_write(pchip, 0x50, 0x03);
+ rval = lm3630a_write(pchip, FLTR_STR, 0x03);
/* set Cofig. register */
rval |= lm3630a_update(pchip, REG_CONFIG, 0x07, pdata->pwm_ctrl);
/* set boost control */
--
2.13.0
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F Bhushan Shah <bshah@kde.org> - 2017-06-21 07:40 +0200
[PATCH v2] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F Bhushan Shah <bshah@kde.org> - 2017-06-21 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-21 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F Bhushan Shah <bshah@kde.org> - 2017-06-21 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] backlight: lm3630a: bump REG_MAX value to 0x50 instead of 0x1F kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-06-22 02:50 +0200
csiph-web