Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #182372
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? |
| Date | 2017-06-19 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tU7Sy-56t-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tTAMW-Uh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tU48i-2E1-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tU7fP-4Bo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | This space intentionally left blank. |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2017-06-19 at 11:59, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> You appear to be claiming that putting ~/bin in PATH is somehow >> inherently unsafe. I don't agree. Under what conditions would >> this result in any kind of privilege escalation? > > The OP was complaining that ~/bin was being *prepended* to PATH, > instead of appended. > > When you prepend ~/bin to PATH, it allows one to have a shell script > such as ~/bin/sudo that will be run instead of the system's sudo. > Then, some use of social engineering might get an admin or some other > user to type in a password to run a command using su or sudo. > > That said, no, it is not usually considered a security > vulnerability, because NOT using the full path to run commands such > as "su" and "sudo" in the first place IS considered gross > negligence. > > So, train your fingers! There is no "su", it *is* /bin/su. And > there is no "sudo", it *is* /usr/bin/sudo. Never trust aliases, > PATH, or anything of the like for this stuff. Wouldn't that seem to be an argument against installing the real su, sudo, and so forth, _anywhere_ in $PATH? If running them in any other way than with the full explicit path is such bad security practice, then why do we install them in such a way as to facilitate doing so? -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? David Bunch <depb@posteo.net> - 2017-06-18 07:20 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-06-18 11:10 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? RavenLX <ravenlx@sitesplace.net> - 2017-06-18 14:00 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? RavenLX <ravenlx@sitesplace.net> - 2017-06-18 14:00 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-06-18 19:10 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-19 14:40 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-06-19 18:00 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-19 18:10 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-06-19 19:20 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Ansgar Burchardt <"Ansgar Burchardt"@43-1.org> - 2017-06-20 01:40 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-06-19 18:10 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-06-19 18:40 +0200
Re: where to submit low security vulnerability in .profile? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-06-19 20:30 +0200
csiph-web