Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1669058

[PATCH 0/2 v5] Fixups for l_pid

From Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 0/2 v5] Fixups for l_pid
Date 2017-06-19 15:30 +0200
Message-ID <tU4UF-3bd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


LTP fcntl tests (fcntl11 fcntl14 fcntl17 fcntl19 fcntl20 fcntl21) have been
failing for NFSv4 mounts due to an unexpected l_pid.  What follows are some
fixups:

v2: - Rebase onto linux-next
    - Revert back to using the stack in locks_mandatory_area(), and fixup
	patch description for 1/3

v3: - The lkp-robot found some serious per_thread_ops performance
	regressions for v1 and v2, so this version changes things around to not
	acquire a reference to struct pid in fl_nspid for every lock.  Instead,
	it drops fl_nspid altogether, and defers the lookup of the
	namespace-translated pid until it actually needed.

v4: - Instead of looking up the virtual pid by way of referencing the struct
	task of the that pid, instead use find_pid_ns() and pid_nr_ns(), which
	avoids a the problem where we race to get a reference to the struct task
	while it may be freed.

v5: - Squash previous 2/3 and 3/3 to avoid regression where F_GETLK would
	return the init_ns pid instead of a translated pid.


Benjamin Coddington (2):
  fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk()
  fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks

 fs/locks.c         | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 include/linux/fs.h |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.3

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/2 v5] Fixups for l_pid Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 15:30 +0200
  [PATCH 1/2] fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 15:30 +0200
  [PATCH 2/2] fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid  for remote locks Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> - 2017-06-19 19:40 +0200

csiph-web