Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.project > #9287

Re: GitHub Open Source Survey 2017

Show all headers | View raw

Martin Bagge / brother wrote:

> Well over 50% have marked CLAs of some type of importance. Isn't that
> high?

Yes, I would have guessed much lower. I would hope it was due to a
philosophical reaction to assigning copyright to $also_commercial_corp
rather than it being merely a hoop to jump through before a PR will be
accepted, but the latter might be skewing the stats.

Can we get more clarity from GitHub itself here..?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: GitHub Open Source Survey 2017 Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2017-06-14 13:10 +0200
  Re: GitHub Open Source Survey 2017 Martin Bagge / brother <brother@bsnet.se> - 2017-06-14 14:20 +0200

csiph-web