Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1656912

Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes

From Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes
Date 2017-06-03 21:40 +0200
Message-ID <tOn3X-2HQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tH7Ql-5WP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOi4h-850-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOm7T-24V-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:37:21PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >>
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Philipp found problems in v14 with using a mutex for locking that was
> >> the outcome of the review for v13, so I'm now using a semaphore instead
> >> of the rwsem that was in v13. That at least got rid of the scary call
> >> to downgrade_write. However, I'm still unsure about what you actually
> >> meant with your comment about lack of sparse markings [1]. I did add
> >> __must_check to the funcs that selects the mux, but I've got this
> >> feeling that this is not what you meant?
> >
> > I thought there was a way to mark a function as requiring a lock be held
> > when it is being called.  Does sparse not support that anymore?
> 
> sparse still support these annotations, of course.
> In this case, I suppose you're talking about '__must_hold()' which
> *must* be used instead of a pair of '__releases()' + '__acquires()'
> when the lock is help on function entry and exit.

Ah, yes, that's what I was thinking of.  I don't know if sparse can
track things like this across an exported symbol, so I doubt it really
will help here.  Sorry for the noise.

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-03 16:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-03 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-06-04 09:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-03 21:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 22:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 00:30 +0200

csiph-web