Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180874
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Live Fille System Backup |
| Date | 2017-05-09 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tFc7L-1x6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tEtNn-5oJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEvPb-6Hv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEZDz-1zC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEZWV-1Vv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tF8dQ-7bU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Unorganized |
On 2017-05-09, tomas@tuxteam.de <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:03:54PM -0700, Sergei G wrote: >> And if you think application consistency is nothing to worry about know >> that Git on Ext4 has failed to recover. >> >> My current conclusion: >> >> 1. If I want application consistency I have to take down any application >> that has an internal database or backup those applications prior to FS >> backup. > > That depends. There are applications designed with (on-disk) consistency > in mind (I mention PostgreSQL, I start sounding like a broken record). > > But whether you have to "take down" the application or just "alert" it > for the time the snapshot takes, without its cooperation you either risk > inconsistent state or bad performance (there are cases where apps chose > number two, because they aren't designed for high throughput anyway). > > The gist is: > > (a) file system magic can't "do" it alone > (b) most of the time, a naive "snapshot" with rsync will do > (b') you alone can decide, based on your apps & requirements, > whether the above "most of the time" works for you > > With snapshotting file systems (be it native or assisted) you get just > faster snapshots, i.e. you mitigate the problem. If you want to go all > the way, you have to get the app's cooperation, either voluntary (it's > designed for that) or forced (shutdown) Because someone mentioned Btrfs and its backup "magic," I'm looking at the wiki, which says (amongst other things): https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Incremental_Backup Instant, Atomic COW Snapshots Since the snapshots are atomic, when a snapshot is restored it appears to applications as if a power loss had occurred (and the filesystem has gone back to an earlier state). Thus it is possible to backup databases without stopping them beforehand. I don't know what an atomic cow is (maybe some poor bovine living near Chernobyl) but it sounds interesting. I wonder if Btrfs has any notable drawbacks as a file system. BTW, I learned (by way of your least favorite search engine) that the inventor of the Monoyer chart (Ferdinand Monoyer) embedded his name (and occupation--DM, docteur en médecine) in the chart (beginning on the penultimate line, the last and first letters read vertically upwards). These French are clever devils. > There's no magic. > > cheers > - -- tomás > "all generalizations suck" > > -- "It might be a vision--of a shell, of a wheelbarrow, of a fairy kingdom on the far side of the hedge; or it might be the glory of speed; no one knew." --Mrs. Ramsay, speculating on why her little daughter might be dashing about, in "To the Lighthouse," by Virginia Woolf.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 01:20 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 03:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 06:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 09:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 22:40 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 23:20 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-05-06 00:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup conover@rahul.net (John Conover) - 2017-05-06 01:30 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-05-06 02:30 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-05-06 00:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-06 08:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-05-06 12:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup tomas@tuxteam.de - 2017-05-06 16:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-05-06 19:20 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-06 21:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-05-06 23:10 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-05-07 01:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-07 12:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-05-07 14:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-07 17:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 00:50 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 01:10 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup tomas@tuxteam.de - 2017-05-09 10:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-05-09 14:10 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-09 14:30 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-05-09 15:20 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-05-09 14:10 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-09 14:30 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-05-05 09:20 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 01:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2017-05-12 15:00 +0200
Re: Live Fille System Backup Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> - 2017-05-25 05:40 +0200
csiph-web