Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180655
| From | Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Console fonts |
| Date | 2017-05-03 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tD5tM-7R3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <tzCRj-1ho-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tC6Lf-1gu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tC8tH-2oO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCLEJ-2o6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCPIm-4Ud-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2 May 2017 18:46:34 -0500, David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: >On Tue 02 May 2017 at 12:20:01 (-0700), Larry Dighera wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:34:14 -0400, Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> wrote: >> > >> >Even if OP can get the ttys working to his liking, I still think it's very >> >likely a lost cause trying to use Jessie on his hardware. Stretch is very near >> >ready to release, and probably OP's better next move. >> > >> >> In this message thread: >> http://www.udoo.org/forum/threads/debian-jessie-linux-os-installation.6819/ >> others have also suggested Stretch. I looked at the existing bugs: >> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/testing.html >> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ >> >> Release-critical bugs status >> >> Tue May 2 17:00:00 UTC 2017 >> >> Total number of release-critical bugs: 1649 >> Number that have a patch: 271 >> Number that have a fix prepared and waiting to upload: 38 >> Number that are being ignored: 78 >> Number concerning the current stable release: 699 >> Number concerning the next release: 149 >> ---- >> >> The reason for installing Debian was because I have been impressed with its >> stability and few update issues compared to other Linux flavors I've used, >> so I was/am reluctant to overwrite Jessie with Stretch. > >Scaling up the words of that ridiculous advert: >699 (stable/jessie) is greater than 149 (testing/stretch). > >But, seriously, those figures need a lot of interpreting. > Are you intimating that the current stable Debian release (Jessie) contains ~4.5 times the number of release-critical bugs of stretch!? > >> Given the Udoo team claims to have installed Debian on their hardware, and >> Tails Linux runs on it, I'd prefer to sort out the issues, and see if I >> (we?) can effect a useable system. > >Reference? It's worth posting exactly what they installed; >distribution, kernel version, etc. > I have submitted that question to the Udoo support team, and am awaiting a response. Also, there is a post here http://www.udoo.org/forum/threads/debian-jessie-linux-os-installation.6819/#post-26261 that indicates that "Debian Stretch (debian-stretch-DI-rc3-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso from [https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/stretch_di_rc3/amd64/iso-cd/]) is working much better for me than Jessie..." > >Cheers, >David. Thank you for your interest in this issue, and your kind support. Best regards, Larry
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-17 06:30 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> - 2017-04-17 11:00 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-17 17:30 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-04-17 18:00 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-18 01:00 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-04-18 10:40 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-20 16:20 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-04-20 16:30 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-04-20 21:20 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-24 04:00 +0200
Console fonts, was Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-04-24 05:30 +0200
Re: Console fonts, was Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-05-01 01:50 +0200
Re: Console fonts Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-05-01 03:40 +0200
Re: Console fonts Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-05-02 21:30 +0200
Re: Console fonts Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-05-03 01:00 +0200
Re: Console fonts David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-03 01:50 +0200
Re: Console fonts Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-05-03 18:40 +0200
Re: Console fonts David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-04 02:40 +0200
Re: Console fonts David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-03 03:30 +0200
Re: Console fonts Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-05-03 19:10 +0200
Re: Console fonts Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-05-03 22:20 +0200
Re: Console fonts David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-04 02:40 +0200
Re: Console fonts, was Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-01 18:30 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Larry Dighera <LDighera@att.net> - 2017-04-23 21:40 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-04-24 00:20 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-04-24 01:50 +0200
Re: Jessie for Udoo X86? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-04-24 14:40 +0200
csiph-web