Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations

From	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations
Date	2017-04-29 00:00 +0200
Message-ID	<tBm5H-55J-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<txHBL-22s-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:00:37PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:54:32 +0200
> 
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.

Hmmm, allocs -> callocs.  Are these actually beneficial?  If so, why?
Because one multiplication is rolled into the call?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-04-29 00:00 +0200
  Re: SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-29 10:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-05-11 17:10 +0200

csiph-web