Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1632272
| From | Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb |
| Date | 2017-04-27 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAVfb-3DH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tAx3c-46S-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAx3c-46S-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAzRn-5Yn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tANhE-6ta-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tATn3-2pt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2017-04-27 17:18 GMT+02:00 Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>: > Ok, that should work as long as you just want to validate that all the > clients loaded the same policy file, and aren't concerned about non- > persistent policy boolean changes. As far as I understand, non-persistent policy boolean changes can affect the way the policy is enforced. So that is a problem if the checksum does not reflect it. We want to protect against someone tampering the policy locally on a Lustre client, even if it does not survive a reboot. I just checked, with the method of computing the checksum on a (data, len) pair on entry to security_load_policy() the checksum does not change after using setsebool. So it seems I would need to call security_read_policy() to retrieve the binary representation of the policy as currently enforced by the kernel. Unless you can see another way? > You needed to get (global) enforcing mode too, didn't you? That's > separate from the policy. Exactly, I also need to rework the patch I proposed about this, in light of the comments I received. > Make sure you make the hash algorithm explicit in both what is returned > by the hook to lustre and by what is exported via selinuxfs. Can > likely just encode the hash algorithm name in the string when you > generate it. Sure, I will add "sha256:" at the beginning of the string.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-26 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-27 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-28 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-28 18:40 +0200
csiph-web