Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1578147
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the selinux tree |
| Date | 2017-02-10 04:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t99Bf-5Yu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sXTq9-36u-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi all,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:27:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the selinux tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/avc.c:35:0:
> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/include/classmap.h:242:2: error: #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
> #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
> ^
> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'socket_type_to_security_class':
> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/hooks.c:1409:2: error: #error New address family defined, please update this function.
>
> Caused by commit
>
> da69a5306ab9 ("selinux: support distinctions among all network address families")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> ac7138746e14 ("smc: establish new socket family")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I added the following merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:22:21 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] selinux: merge fix for "smc: establish new socket family"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 +++-
> security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index bada3cd42b9c..712fd0e7c91d 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -1405,7 +1405,9 @@ static inline u16 socket_type_to_security_class(int family, int type, int protoc
> return SECCLASS_KCM_SOCKET;
> case PF_QIPCRTR:
> return SECCLASS_QIPCRTR_SOCKET;
> -#if PF_MAX > 43
> + case PF_SMC:
> + return SECCLASS_SMC_SOCKET;
> +#if PF_MAX > 44
> #error New address family defined, please update this function.
> #endif
> }
> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> index 0dfd26d0b8d8..40f1d4f8bc2a 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> +++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> @@ -235,9 +235,11 @@ struct security_class_mapping secclass_map[] = {
> { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
> { "qipcrtr_socket",
> { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
> + { "smc_socket",
> + { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
> { NULL }
> };
>
> -#if PF_MAX > 43
> +#if PF_MAX > 44
> #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
> #endif
> --
> 2.10.2
This now applies when I merge the security tree (as it merged the
selinux tree, presumably).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the selinux tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-10 04:00 +0100 Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the selinux tree Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-02-10 13:50 +0100
csiph-web