Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family
Date	2017-02-09 13:10 +0100
Message-ID	<t8VHX-5Z8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t8qNQ-33A-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8rgR-3hA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8LfA-7rl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8M1X-7XZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:48:09AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:52:07PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

> > Personally, I'd prefer "dt-bindings: sound: blah...", but not enough to 
> > argue with Mark about it. If that is not the prefix, then it should at 
> > least have "binding" in the subject.

> +1

> The prefix of sound bindings is quite unique from other subsystems.
> Looking at the prefix of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
> commits, I'm always confused whether it's a pure binding commit
> or just submitted as part of the driver patch.  I feel that we
> kinda lose the point of having a prefix.

That's really not what's happening reliably - other subsystems also seem
to have a bunch of things prefixed for the subsystem and the DT specific
prefixes are all over the shop, people seem to be making them up at
random.  If DT binding review were something that reliably and
consistently happened and didn't affect the subsystem I'd perhaps buy it
but for run of the mill stuff it seems like getting things reviewed in
the subsystem is more important.

Thread

[PATCH v3 1/3] clk: zte: add i2s clocks for zx296718 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2017-02-08 04:10 +0100
  [PATCH v3 3/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2017-02-08 04:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2017-02-08 15:40 +0100
  [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2017-02-08 04:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 02:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 02:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 13:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 23:50 +0100

csiph-web