Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #31048
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? |
| Date | 2022-06-13 09:52 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t86qc3$8nl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <6e043c6a-b32b-4192-ba42-cfc3b72d646dn@googlegroups.com> |
On 13/06/2022 03:44, Rick C wrote: > I'm not sure which group it was in, but someone who designs toys > talked about the extremes they would go to for cost reduction, > removing useful, but not essential resistors because they were $0.001 > each. > I remember that poster (though not his name) - I believe you are in the correct group. I have no idea if he is still lurking here. > I'm trying to find out if there are still 4 bit MCUs used in new > products. I see a number of companies who make them, but I have no > pricing. I have found 8 bit MCUs that are available for $0.05 each > in just moderate quantities at LCSC. But then, maybe LCSC is not a > vendor anyone should depend on. > > Anyone here design with 4 bit MCUs? Anyone design things that are > built in millions? Is there a difference in price that adds up at > such high volumes? > > How about power levels? 8 bit MCUs are pretty low power these days. > Do 4 bit MCUs make a difference in your designs? > As far as I know, there are no longer any 4-bit microcontrollers available for "normal" customers. The last family was the MARC4, from Atmel. There are still some manufacturers that make 4-bit microcontrollers, but they are typically bare-die devices with vast minimum order quantities and masked ROM programs - there are few situations where they are economically viable now. If your company directory does not play golf with the manufacturer's company director, it's unlikely that you'll ever use these devices. The cheapest microcontroller family I know of are from Padauk - they get down to about $0.03 even in quite small quantities, with free toolchains and available datasheets, appnotes, etc.. (Note that the references I have seen are pre-Covid and before the current component availability crisis, so things may have changed.) <https://jaycarlson.net/2019/09/06/whats-up-with-these-3-cent-microcontrollers/> <https://cpldcpu.wordpress.com/2019/08/12/the-terrible-3-cent-mcu/> If you don't need to be quite so obsessive about the price, for $0.50 you should even be able to get 32-bit devices. The choice of peripherals and configuration is probably more important than the core - if you can pick a device with the right pin drives, internal pull-ups or pull-downs, that will save the cost of the device. The cheapest device I have used personally was an 8-bit AVR Tiny - 2 KB flash, no ram, 8 bytes eeprom (IIRC). I don't remember the price, but I believe it was cheaper than the LED on the board. If the tiny coin cell battery on the board had no self-discharge, the system would have had a standby lifetime of about 200 years - pretty low power!
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:44 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-13 09:52 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2022-06-13 22:11 +1000
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-06-14 07:46 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Stef <me@this.is.invalid> - 2022-06-13 14:47 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 08:34 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Stef <me@this.is.invalid> - 2022-06-14 23:29 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-15 08:55 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Stef <me@this.is.invalid> - 2022-06-15 09:25 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 10:38 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-15 15:20 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 06:53 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Uwe Bonnes <bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> - 2022-06-15 14:12 +0000
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 17:11 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-15 17:20 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 09:12 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2022-06-16 01:35 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 23:46 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-16 09:08 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-16 13:47 +0000
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-17 09:15 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Stef <me@this.is.invalid> - 2022-06-16 09:34 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 08:03 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? chris <chris-nospam@tridac.net> - 2022-06-17 01:05 +0100
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 17:16 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-06-14 07:51 +0200
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 08:48 -0700
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-06-14 21:48 +0100
Re: 4 Bit MCUs, Still Alive and Kicking? Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2022-06-17 13:36 +0200
csiph-web