Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #177436
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 |
| Date | 2017-02-05 09:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t7qGd-4YY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t7q3v-4KU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > Why is that? What am I missing? I can hardly believe that kernel 4.9 is so > much faster. I would say efficient and as such faster. Why not ask the kernel people, or have a look at the code changes. regards
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-02-05 09:10 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 09:50 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-02-05 10:50 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2017-02-05 11:20 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-02-05 11:30 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-02-05 11:50 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 13:00 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-02-05 22:10 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-02-06 00:20 +0100
Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9 Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-02-06 07:30 +0100
csiph-web