Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #540676
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible |
| Date | 2015-12-21 21:23 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t77mkc-c5i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <b_WdncAKP_mRy-XLnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible >> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/limiting-global-warming-will-be-hard-but-hardly-impossible/ > > >> For decades, researchers have been sounding the alarm on climate >> change: it?s happening, we?re causing it, it?s bad. The message from >> IPCC and elsewhere has long been that solving the climate challenge >> is technically feasible, and what?s missing is political will. With >> the adoption of the Paris Agreement last weekend, the world finally >> has its mandate of political will. In total, 196 nations confirmed >> that climate change is a ?common concern of humankind? and adopted >> the target to limit warming well below 2? Celsius, aiming for no more >> than 1.5? above preindustrial levels. For the first time, these >> temperature targets are linked with mechanisms to achieve them, which >> sends a powerful signal that society is ready to act on climate >> change. >> >> What does this mean for scientists? I see this as a clarion call for >> more researchers (including myself) to reorient our work towards >> further exploring and creating solutions to meet the social mandate >> to live in a world where many of the worst impacts never happen, >> while understanding the impacts that are already here and those >> expected under the new target. The first is necessary to meet the >> ambitious but essential target; the second, to determine the >> magnitude of the investments in resilience, and flows of both >> technology and finance, that will be required to manage the impacts. No warming for almost 19 years in spite of the Chicken Little hysteria. Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50% http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/21/study-noaa-overestimated-us-warming-50 Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 14:15 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-21 18:08 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 21:11 -0500
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 03:31 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:31 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:31 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 16:43 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 17:14 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 02:10 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 22:36 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 06:06 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:13 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-22 09:28 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 01:14 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:12 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:11 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 22:35 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:27 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-12-22 09:16 -0500
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-22 12:41 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 20:48 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:11 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:33 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:35 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:34 +0000
csiph-web