Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup

From	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup
Date	2017-02-04 01:50 +0100
Message-ID	<t6WIa-13a-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sZ7U5-7f-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ8ZQ-L2-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ9VT-1kp-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6MIO-2yZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6MSt-2Co-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> wrote:
> > Darren, Andy,
> >
> > Please drop this patch series for now.  I will send a rebased v2 after a
> > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked
> > form.
> 
> Noted.
> 
> Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes,
> for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be
> broken or be in a wrong state.
> Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as

In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you
require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-03 15:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 15:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-02-04 01:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> - 2017-02-04 07:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 15:20 +0100

csiph-web