Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83881

Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity

From "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity
Date 2022-04-29 19:30 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <t4h7ap$6uc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <t4g5no$raf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8307c4f9-8b63-49c4-a4a4-d089313df1efn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 29 Apr 2022 15:29, Öö Tiib wrote:
> void foobar(std::initializer_list<int>) { std::cout << "yuck!!!\n"; abort();}

I think you meant `= delete` for compile time detection, not a run time 
error.

Probably a thinko (that's like a typo, brain on auto-pilot).

Cheers,

- Alf

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Uniform initialization ambiguity Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-29 07:56 +0000
  Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-29 06:29 -0700
    Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 19:30 +0200
    Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-29 19:54 +0000
  Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:42 -0700
    Re: Uniform initialization ambiguity Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:48 -0700

csiph-web