Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83823
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: qsort() vs. std::sort |
| Date | 2022-04-28 06:58 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t4d6sn$ol3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <t4092b$des$1@dont-email.me> <082pji-tuv1.ln1@wilbur.25thandClement.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
> Unsurprising that inlining can improve performance. Your raw numbers are > useless, though, as you're comparing different algorithms (C++ header > template vs libc), ... No, the numbers aren't useless, they compare the C- and the C++-way to sort things. > Also, technically > speaking your gripe is largely with toolchains (particularly wrt the > performance of standard library interfaces like qsort) as there's nothing > preventing toolchains from inlining qsort ... LOL, there's no C compiler which will do that. The qsort-function is just a static piece of code and nothing is inlined.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 09:15 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 09:31 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-25 05:56 +0000
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 08:27 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-25 01:16 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 12:59 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 13:32 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-25 05:26 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 17:41 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-26 00:46 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 12:19 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 05:24 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 17:42 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 05:26 +0000
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-26 00:19 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-26 14:03 +0000
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 08:50 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-29 01:38 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 02:39 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-29 04:06 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 12:28 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-26 04:54 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 14:10 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-26 06:23 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 16:26 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort William Ahern <william@25thandClement.com> - 2022-04-27 17:03 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 06:58 +0200
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-28 06:33 +0000
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-28 01:08 -0700
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-28 08:23 +0000
Re: qsort() vs. std::sort William Ahern <william@25thandClement.com> - 2022-04-28 02:55 -0700
csiph-web