Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #177029

Re: Early boot became slower

From Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Early boot became slower
Date 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
Message-ID <t4aRj-2ha-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <t3xGi-3sb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3BAd-5W9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3Wlk-1PQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3XKq-2N9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t42K5-5KK-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization less than infinite

Show all headers | View raw


Mattia Oss composed on 2017-01-27 01:34 (UTC+0100):

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:18:36PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:

>> For the boot menu, or after?

> To clarify I uploaded some videos (sorry for the crappy quality :/ )

You haven't answered my question.

> linux-image-4.8.0-1-amd64:
> https://goo.gl/TsXUBB

> This was the last kernel with fast boot. In /etc/default/grub I had:
> GRUB_GFXMODE=1920x1080
> GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=keep

> Since linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64 the boot process is slower.
> linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64:
> https://goo.gl/buOcpj

> ok it's not that slow but I think the difference is quite visible.
> I said that the problem may be the framebuffer (vesafb/simplefb) only
> because this was the only big difference in the 2 dmesg. But it can be
> anything.

> This is what I used for the moment.
> linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64 with GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=text:
> https://goo.gl/16MJgc

None of those play for me. The resolution on the initial screens is so poor that 
I can't make out anything useful except to suggest to remove quiet the splash= 
parameter from the cmdline (or change it to splash=0) and see what happens 
without the graphical background or the output supression.

>> If after, what gfxchip do you have, maybe something other than NVidia,
>> AMD/ATI or Intel? Use 'lspci | grep VGA' or 'inxi -c0 -G' to report here.

> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06)
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Hawaii XT / Grenada XT [Radeon R9 290X/390X]

I don't have any AMD gfx that new around here. I have the same Intel gfx as you 
on my newest machine and no problem with any kernel going back all the way to 
when the machine was brand new going on two years ago.

>> Video= tells the kernel to use the specified mode for the KMS framebuffers.
>> Pick a mode that matches your display's native resolution to get the
>> smallest possible text.

>> If one of the above produce a result you like, you can reconfigure Grub to

> I tried with video=1920x1080 but there's no difference.

On those initial video screens I see no evidence of any "huge" characters.
-- 
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 17:20 +0100
  Re: Early boot became slower Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2017-01-24 17:40 +0100
    Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 18:10 +0100
      Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 16:30 +0100
        Re: Early boot became slower Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2017-01-25 20:40 +0100
          Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 18:50 +0100
            Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-26 20:20 +0100
              Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 01:40 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 18:00 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-27 19:10 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 20:20 +0100
                Early boot became slower Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2017-01-30 10:10 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-30 11:30 +0100
                Early boot became slower Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2017-01-30 23:50 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-31 01:00 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-31 04:00 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 18:30 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 22:10 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Mattia Oss <mais.toast@gmail.com> - 2017-01-28 18:20 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-28 23:00 +0100
                Re: Early boot became slower Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-28 23:10 +0100
            Re: Early boot became slower deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 20:50 +0100

csiph-web