Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1512680

Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event
Date 2016-10-31 17:30 +0100
Message-ID <synDb-4Pf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <swBKh-809-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxkem-3uE-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxlk5-46E-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxGRA-1Nn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxX62-4sU-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Axel Haslam wrote:

> The event  REGULATOR_EVENT_OVER_CURRENT allready exists.
> what is missing and what i would need form the usb driver, is a way for
> the consumer to know that the over current condition is over.
> since i cannot do this with get mode, and get status is not exported,

> We can do this adding a more generic event flag:
> REGULATOR_EVENT_ERRORS_CLEARED

> that would be sent by the supply when all errors are over, and the
> regulator is back to  normal operation.

That's a different thing and definitely not what you were saying in the
changelog.  I don't think this is something that it makes sense to do
with events as it's not something that devices will tend to generate
interrupts for, anything that is going to rely on events for that is
going to be broken.  Hardware is mostly designed with the idea that
errors are catastrophic.

If you really care about things clearing then you need to add a sensible
interface for exposting all the possible error conditions that users can
poll.  The reason get_mode() got rejected was that error statuses and
modes are completely different things, get_status() is not going to work
for you since it is very common for multiple errors to happen at the
same time.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-10-28 20:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> - 2016-10-28 21:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> - 2016-10-29 11:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-10-29 20:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> - 2016-10-30 13:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-10-31 17:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-01 16:50 +0100

csiph-web