Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1510913
| From | Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking |
| Date | 2016-10-28 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sxaeZ-5mE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sx9Ch-59A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sx9VD-5fQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016-10-28 00:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:10:39AM -0700, Vikram Mulukutla wrote: >> >> We propose Window-Assisted Load Tracking (WALT) as an alternative or >> additional >> load tracking scheme in lieu of or along with PELT, one that in our >> estimation >> better tracks task demand and CPU utilization especially for use cases >> on >> mobile devices. WALT was conceived by Srivatsa Vaddagiri to provide >> better >> perf-per-watt numbers on asymmetric CPU (frequency and/or IPC) >> implementations, >> (specifically on Qualcomm Snapgdragon chipsets running Android) and >> its metrics >> have been used to guide task placement and p-state selection (load >> balancing >> in CFS still uses PELT statistics). WALT is now present in the >> android-common >> kernel as well. > > And how come we only learn of it after its already shipping? Isn't that > arse backwards? Yes, but also we were not confident that it would be close to being acceptable upstream since it was intricately tied to our HMP scheduler. However now that more parties including the folks at ARM are interested, and given that EAS exists and schedutil was merged into mainline, we felt it the right time to try and introduce the concept. In general we are seriously trying to get more things upstream and converge.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-28 09:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-28 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-28 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Introduce Window Assisted Load Tracking Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-31 16:10 +0100
csiph-web