Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1504538
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result |
| Date | 2016-10-20 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suf1v-3Po-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sucQ1-2td-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. > > The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. > > I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot > services forever". However, that commit is known to be broken. The > proposed fix, commit 92dc33501bfb "x86/efi: Round EFI memmap > reservations to EFI_PAGE_SIZE", also exhibits the reboot problem. > > During the bisect some of the stopping points landed on commits that > caused the boot process to hang rather than cause a reboot. The > commits that resulted in a hang are marked "git bisect skip" in this > log: https://gist.github.com/djbw/1b501daa98192a42ae848f03bb59c30e > > I'll try treating those hangs as bad bisect results and re-run the > full bisect tomorrow. In the meantime I wonder if the bisect log > implicates a better regression candidate? You could also try reverts of the suspicious commits, and then, if the reverted kernel works fine, create a more linear history by cherry-picking them in the right order - and then be able to pinpoint the bad commit with a higher confidence. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-20 06:10 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-10-20 08:30 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-10-20 14:30 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-20 17:30 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-20 21:40 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-10-21 09:10 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-21 20:30 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-10-21 17:50 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-10-21 22:30 +0200
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-22 01:30 +0200
csiph-web