Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1500184

Re: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:44:36 AM CEST Mintz, Yuval wrote:
> > > > > While I don't mind, you could have argued is that we're not
> > > > > removing enough, not too much.
> > > > > I.e., perhaps the rdma_msix_* fields should also have been
> > > > > ifdef-ed instead. [in which case this solution would not have
> > > > > worked]
> > > >
> > > > That would add even more #ifdefs though.
> > >
> > > I agree. Although I'm never clear on the guidelines for the tradeoff -
> > > How much memory/code is considered too much so that you'd have To
> > > ifdef code out instead of 'wasting'?
> > > [I obviously don't claim 64 bytes of memory hit that threshold]
> > 
> > I don't think code size should ever be a reason for an #ifdef in a .c
> > file: if the code is well-structured, you can always get the same object code
> > using if(IS_ENABLED()) checks within the code at better readability or better
> > compile-time coverage.
> > 
> > Between if(IS_ENABLED()) checks and inline helpers, it usually doesn't matter
> > much either way as long as the separation between the modules is clear enough.
> > In the example above, removing the structure fields however would require to
> > move the debugging output into another inline function though.
> 
> Still, the question remains - If we were to allocate X bytes of memory
> per-something [in this case, per qed owned PCI function], and that memory
> wouldn't be functional without a some CONFIG option enabled,
> how big should X become before we'd decide the fields should also be
> dependent on the option?
> It bears no real relevance to this case, as the fields involved are
> insignificantly small. But still - is there a rule of thumb here?

I don't think there is a good general rule for that, given the
vastly different memory sizes in machines. For a tiny embedded
machine with 2MB of RAM, saving one kilobyte is very significant,
while an any machine that uses a 500KB qed driver module probably
has many gigabytes of RAM and doesn't care much about a
a wasted megabyte.

	Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-12 12:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-13 11:20 +0200
    RE: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com> - 2016-10-13 11:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-13 12:30 +0200
        RE: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com> - 2016-10-13 12:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-13 13:20 +0200
  RE: [PATCH] qede: fix CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR=m build error "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com> - 2016-10-13 14:30 +0200

csiph-web