Re: 1.0 / 0.0

From	Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: 1.0 / 0.0
Date	2022-01-03 08:36 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<squcif$pkv$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <sqmlqt$1vhs$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sqnf01$1hn9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <squ4m0$258$1@gioia.aioe.org> <squb43$2oi$1@redfloyd.dont-email.me> <squc3a$84h$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Alf P. Steinbach <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> wrote:
> Still, in a class definition `static` means something else than above, 
> and can't be omitted for a `constexpr` data member.
> 
> That's unreasonable to me: the language /requiring/ you to write a 
> meaningless filler word, a word that can't be omitted but carries no 
> extra meaning and doesn't help the compiler's parsing. As I see it 
> `constexpr` for data should also have implied static storage duration. 
> It's gut-wrenching that it does not.

I haven't tried it, but couldn't a (non-static) constexpr member
variable be usable in classes that are intended for constexpr
evaluation only?

Or is it semantically just not possible to have a non-static
constexpr member variable?

Thread

1.0 / 0.0 Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-12-29 20:00 +0100
  Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Jack Lemmon <invalid@invalid.net> - 2021-12-29 19:15 +0000
    Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-12-29 21:20 +0100
  Re: 1.0 / 0.0 "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-12-29 13:08 -0800
    Re: 1.0 / 0.0 "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-12-29 20:37 -0800
  Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-12-30 17:25 +0200
    Re: 1.0 / 0.0 "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-12-30 08:55 -0800
  Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-12-30 18:48 +0100
    Re: 1.0 / 0.0 "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-12-30 10:16 -0800
      Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-12-30 20:02 +0100
        Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2021-12-31 10:25 +0000
          Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-12-31 18:34 +0100
            Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-03 06:21 +0000
              Re: 1.0 / 0.0 red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2022-01-03 00:11 -0800
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 09:28 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-03 08:36 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-03 09:24 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-03 17:14 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-03 16:22 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-01-03 17:40 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-04 09:15 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-01-04 15:24 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-04 16:06 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-04 07:58 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-04 09:17 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-01-03 23:14 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-03 23:50 -0800
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-01-04 10:42 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-04 10:15 -0800
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2022-01-04 20:49 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-04 15:40 -0800
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-04 08:34 +0000
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-01-04 10:47 +0100
                Re: 1.0 / 0.0 Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-16 12:40 -0800

csiph-web