Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521091
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Public access to scientists' email increasingly politicized |
| Date | 2015-09-14 13:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sqadnfiPyeinkGrInZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Public access to scientists' email increasingly politicized > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8138 > Scientists report Freedom to Bully: How Laws Intended to Free > Information Are Used to Harass Researchers, the UCS charged: “Open > records laws are increasingly being used as a weapon against > researchers whose work threatens private interests.” But sometimes > seekers of scientists’ email target researchers whose work instead > aids private interests, as seen in this headline from above the fold > on the Sunday, 6 September, New York Times front page: “Emails reveal > academic ties in a food war: Industry swaps grants for lobbying > clout.” > The UCS announcement summarized the growing politicization of > scientists’ email: > The use of open records laws to harass researchers emerged with the > growing use of electronic communications. Conversations that used to > take place over the phone or in person are now conducted by email, a > format that leaves a permanent record. When these email discussions > are made public through records requests, the privacy that academics > have long enjoyed in discussions with colleagues is compromised. This > can have a chilling effect on the frank exchange of ideas and > constructive criticism, a crucial part of the scientific process. > Abuse of open records requests can also hinder researchers simply by > hijacking their schedule. Complying with requests may take dozens or > even hundreds of hours of researchers’ time, putting their real work > on hold or on the back burner for a long while. This may often be the > main purpose of such requests. > The announcement gave examples involving, for example, climate > scientists supporting the climate consensus, climate scientists > opposing it, tobacco health-effects researchers, an environmental > chemist “saddled with ‘the largest open records request ever made in > Minnesota’ in an apparent effort to shut the research down,” and an > occupational health scientist who “found himself on the receiving end > of multiple open records requests from the Highland Mining Co. > starting in 2012” for investigating the health implications of the > environmental effects of mountaintop removal. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Public access to scientists' email increasingly politicized Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 13:08 -0500 Re: Public access to scientists' email increasingly politicized gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 10:55 -0500
csiph-web