Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #14306
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: What's new with the other programming models? |
| Date | 2021-12-03 10:02 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <socmev$rdq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <46f3383c-dfc2-4fc6-8090-8ef03229343fn@googlegroups.com> |
On 03/12/2021 07:13, luser droog wrote: > All the cool developments over the past 80 years or so > has been focus on the Church and Turing models. Considering > all functional stuff to be essentially Church and all Von Neumann > or procedural programming to be essentially Turing. > (Just to be clear, in case anyone is unsure - Church and Turing were very interested in the theory of what could be computed, rather than how to compute it, and their models along with all other models come up with the same set of computable functions. Different models, including quantum computing, can all solve the same problems - they just do it in different ways, and can have different efficiencies in terms of time and size.) > What's up with the other models? Anything new being done > with Post systems or Thue system? Are there other weirder ones? > > I suppose Macro processors are in a sense a development > of Post string rewriting. But, .... not really. Nobody does > Macro processing like that, right? You pack more built-in > power to the macro itself, with math and lists and control > structures and stuff, right? > You are going to have to give some links, references or details here. There are people here who have heard of some pretty unusual languages, but no one has heard of everything! The two big programming models that are fashionable these days are quantum computing and neural networks. Every now and again I also hear about some new chip designed around the model of a sea of simple computing units that each do a small part of the overall work. This is different from cellular automata networks (where each cell has the same program and configuration) and neural networks (where each cell has the same program but different configuration, or connections and weights).
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's new with the other programming models? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-02 22:13 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-03 10:02 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-03 19:40 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-03 21:03 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-04 16:03 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-12-03 11:24 +0000
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-03 13:04 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-03 21:26 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-04 01:14 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-04 16:47 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-05 02:55 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-05 13:29 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-05 14:52 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-12-05 22:59 +0000
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-05 15:09 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-06 09:00 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-06 00:05 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-12-06 08:17 +0000
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-06 00:20 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-12-06 09:44 +0000
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-06 11:25 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-12-06 09:02 -0800
Re: What's new with the other programming models? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-12-06 18:51 +0100
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-12-06 17:58 +0000
Re: What's new with the other programming models? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-12-06 18:05 +0000
csiph-web