Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #162572
| From | Ike Naar <ike@rie.sdf.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Working code |
| Date | 2021-09-02 05:22 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnsj0nro.1o4.ike@rie.sdf.org> (permalink) |
| References | <sgouhf$8i2$1@z-news.wcss.wroc.pl> <86fsunx2yy.fsf@linuxsc.com> <sgpi2p$kd1$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2021-09-02, Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/1/2021 4:58 PM, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>>> The following is simplified version of "working code": it
>>> is more than 20 years old (probably closer to 30 years old)
>>> and apparently did what its author intended:
>>>
>>> int (*handlers[2])();
>>>
>>> #define DO_IT(n) ((p = handlers[n]) ? (*p)() : 0)
>>>
>>> static void foo() {
>>> register int (*p)();
>>> register int bar = DO_IT(0) | DO_IT(1);
>>> /* ... */
>>> /* Use of bar */
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Code that fills 'handlers' and calls foo() */
>>>
>>> I wonder what you think about this code?
>>
>> I think it has undefined behavior, and needlessly so:
>>
>> #define DO_IT(n) (handlers[n] ? handlers[n]() : 0)
>>
>> ...
>
> That intermediate variable `p` is indeed completely unnecessary. But
> where did you find undefined behavior in the original version?
In the expression 'DO_IT(0) | DO_IT(1);' p is being modified more than once.
The behaviour of the expression depends on how its subexpressions are sequenced.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Working code antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-09-01 22:23 +0000
Re: Working code Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-01 16:58 -0700
Re: Working code Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-01 20:57 -0700
Re: Working code Ike Naar <ike@rie.sdf.org> - 2021-09-02 05:22 +0000
Re: Working code Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-01 22:33 -0700
Re: Working code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-02 11:54 +0100
Re: Working code Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-02 07:08 -0400
Re: Working code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-02 13:37 +0100
Re: Working code James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-02 12:03 -0400
Re: Working code Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-02 09:57 -0700
Re: Working code Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-01 21:02 -0700
Re: Working code John McCue <jmccue@obsd2.mhome.org> - 2021-09-02 13:31 +0000
csiph-web