Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39164

Re: Thread and synchonized question

From Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Thread and synchonized question
Date 2019-09-30 10:10 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <slrnqp3l52.36g.avl@logic.at> (permalink)
References <55e14769-2ee7-4e11-8f66-69c1b7bf0241@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We have class A with method synchronized connect(int) that calls
> class B that has synchronized connect() (main thread)
> I guess the lock will be on class A?

There are some relevant details missing, so there are two options:
A) either or both of the methods are static, or there are two objects
     one of A and one of B that you call the method on: then the locks
     are independent, and main thread just hold both.
B) One of the methods is just a superclass method, and both "synchronize"s
     address the same object, and the main thread holds that one twice.

> What if class B and synchronized connect()is called by another
> thread ( reconnect thread) I guess lock is on class B.

> So does this mean that both main and reconnect threads can access
> the synchronized connect() on class B?

That can be pretty surely excluded in either of the above cases.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Thread and synchonized question mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> - 2019-09-30 00:32 -0700
  Re: Thread and synchonized question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-09-30 10:10 +0000
    Re: Thread and synchonized question mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> - 2019-09-30 04:38 -0700
      Re: Thread and synchonized question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-09-30 13:48 +0000
  Re: Thread and synchonized question Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-09-30 17:07 -0400
  Re: Thread and synchonized question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-09-30 19:48 -0400

csiph-web