Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Héctor Abreu <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure |
| Date | 2019-03-11 13:54 +0000 |
| Organization | Spanish Connector |
| Message-ID | <slrnq8cq5k.fpn.invalid@eternal-september.org> (permalink) |
| References | <0hnglf-alp.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> |
On 2019-03-11, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > From the «probably all Deb's fault» department: > Title: Debian Package Maintainer Steps Down, Complaining About 'Old Infrast > Author: help@slashdot.org > Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:49:00 -0400 > Link: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/k_N9L7bEecM/debian-pa > > Michael Stapelberg, maintains "a bunch" of Debian packages and services, and > says the free software Linux distro "has been in my life for well over 10 years > at this point." Today he released a 2,255-word essay explaining why he's > "winding down" his involvement in Debian to a minimum, citing numerous > complaints including Debian's complicated build stack, waits of up to seven > hours before package uploads can be installed, leading to "asynchronous" > feedback -- and Debian's lack of tooling for large changes. The closest to > "sending out a change for review" is to open a bug report with an attached > patch... Culturally, reviews and reactions are slow. There are no deadlines. I > literally sometimes get emails notifying me that a patch I sent out a few years > ago (!!) is now merged. This turns projects from a small number of weeks into > many years, which is a huge demotivator for me. Interestingly enough, you can > see artifacts of the slow online activity manifest itself in the offline > culture as well: I don't want to be discussing systemd's merits 10 years after > I first heard about it. Lastly, changes can easily be slowed down significantly > by holdouts who refuse to collaborate. My canonical example for this is rsync, > whose maintainer refused my patches to make the package use debhelper purely > out of personal preference. Granting so much personal freedom to individual > maintainers prevents us as a project from raising the abstraction level for > building Debian packages, which in turn makes tooling harder. There's also > several complaints about old infrastructure -- for example, "I dread > interacting with the Debian bug tracker. debbugs is a piece of software (from > 1994) which is only used by Debian and the GNU project these days." Stapelberg > also complains that the "painful" experience of developing using Debian "leaves > a lot to be desired," and adds that "It baffles me that in 2019, we still don't > have a conveniently browsable threaded archive of mailing list discussions." > "My frustration level ultimately exceeded the threshold," Stapelberg writes in > the essay, adding "I hope this post inspires someone, ideally a group of > people, to improve the developer experience within Debian." He'll soon > transition packages to be team-maintained "where it makes sense," but also > "orphan packages where I am the sole maintainer... For all intents and > purposes, please treat me as permanently on vacation..." "I will try to keep up > best-effort maintenance of the manpages.debian.org service and the > codesearch.debian.net service, but any help would be much appreciated." > I just hope that the chaos described in that post won't affect Devuan, the Debian's fork I chose to work with. I don't understand much about the systemd's controversy, I just chose Devuan because it will let me continue working as I have traditionally done with Debian, with no significant changes. -- Héctor Abreu
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-10 20:42 -0400
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure Héctor Abreu <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-11 13:54 +0000
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-03-12 09:41 -0400
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-03-12 18:46 +0000
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-03-13 02:01 -0300
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2019-03-13 12:19 +0200
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-03-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Debian maintainer laments old infrastructure Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:08 +0000
csiph-web