Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.lang.intercal > #5

Re: E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29

From Claudio Calvelli <c.news@w42.org.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.lang.intercal
Subject Re: E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29
Date 2016-07-12 21:49 +0000
Organization No thanks
Message-ID <slrnnoapfc.1f3.c.news@z.w42.org> (permalink)
References <87d1mofqyy.fsf@ieval.ro> <slrnno9gg9.2d6.c.news@z.w42.org> <nm354g$c39$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-07-12, ais523 wrote:
> I guess the commit hasn't made its way to gentoo yet. (I'm not entirely
> sure where the C-INTERCAL repository is, at the moment; git lists three
> remotes but none of them are accessible. If nobody can find it, let me
> know and I'll throw up another mirror somewhere using my local copy as
> the source.)

Well, guess what?  Gentoo lists my server as source...  but I don't
remember having received an update in a long time (the most recent I
have is dated April 1, 2011).  Please feel free to send the most recent
version to me (just remove the ".invalid" from the "From" line of this
post).

Since this sounds like a bug with the Gentoo ebuild, we can fix that by
opening a bug report with them (either listing the current repositories,
or by telling them there's an update available).

C

Back to alt.lang.intercal | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29 Marius Gavrilescu <marius@ieval.ro> - 2016-07-08 11:56 +0300
  Re: E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29 Claudio Calvelli <c.news@w42.org.invalid> - 2016-07-12 10:10 +0000
    Re: E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29 ais523 <ais523@nethack4.org> - 2016-07-12 16:16 +0000
      Re: E129 and E633 confusion in C-INTERCAL 0.29 Claudio Calvelli <c.news@w42.org.invalid> - 2016-07-12 21:49 +0000

csiph-web