Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2644

Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox

Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
From Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au>
Subject Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox
References <slrnnll8f1.5c2.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <MPG.31c4f97f90a819e989906@usenet.plus.net> <slrnnlmrsq.1gg.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <1b1fbbfa-6e46-44cb-bf76-069185a7e3e9@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <slrnnlmune.1s1.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> (permalink)
Date 2016-06-11 02:43 +0000
Organization Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com

Show all headers | View raw


> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:56:56 PM UTC+12, Peter Billam wrote:
>>  gs respects the BoundingBox comment when setting the jpeg media-size.

That's not true :-( sorry! it's convert that respects BoundingBox
  convert t.eps t.jpg
I've been using gs through a preprocessor script which extracted
the BoundingBox numbers and then invoked
  gs -q -sDEVICE=jpeg -g75x37.5 -sOutputFile=t.jpg
accordingly.  (It's all invoked from Makefiles of course.)
But I should have been using PageSize within t.ps anyway.

>> (I've been using EPS so that my little graphics could then be
>> inserted into html in jpg form, or into desktop-publishing or
>> other PS in EPS form; very orthogonal :-))

On 2016-06-11, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) I wouldn’t use JPEG for hard-edged graphics like that. Have you
> tried PNG? Then you could also leave the background transparent.

Fair enough; I might restandardise on png.

> 2) Does anybody still care about EPS for desktop publishing?

I don't really know, I've never used it :-)

> I imagine rasterizing at something like 360dpi (OK, maybe 720dpi
> for bilevel) would be sufficient for any paper-publishing need...

Bigger files, though...

Thanks,
Peter

-- 

Peter Billam    www.pjb.com.au    www.pjb.com.au/comp/contact.html

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-10 11:17 +0000
  Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-06-10 15:00 +0200
  Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2016-06-10 17:22 +0100
    Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-11 01:55 +0000
      Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 19:18 -0700
        Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-11 02:43 +0000
          Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:37 -0700

csiph-web