Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2644
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> |
| Subject | Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox |
| References | <slrnnll8f1.5c2.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <MPG.31c4f97f90a819e989906@usenet.plus.net> <slrnnlmrsq.1gg.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <1b1fbbfa-6e46-44cb-bf76-069185a7e3e9@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <slrnnlmune.1s1.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-06-11 02:43 +0000 |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:56:56 PM UTC+12, Peter Billam wrote: >> gs respects the BoundingBox comment when setting the jpeg media-size. That's not true :-( sorry! it's convert that respects BoundingBox convert t.eps t.jpg I've been using gs through a preprocessor script which extracted the BoundingBox numbers and then invoked gs -q -sDEVICE=jpeg -g75x37.5 -sOutputFile=t.jpg accordingly. (It's all invoked from Makefiles of course.) But I should have been using PageSize within t.ps anyway. >> (I've been using EPS so that my little graphics could then be >> inserted into html in jpg form, or into desktop-publishing or >> other PS in EPS form; very orthogonal :-)) On 2016-06-11, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) I wouldn’t use JPEG for hard-edged graphics like that. Have you > tried PNG? Then you could also leave the background transparent. Fair enough; I might restandardise on png. > 2) Does anybody still care about EPS for desktop publishing? I don't really know, I've never used it :-) > I imagine rasterizing at something like 360dpi (OK, maybe 720dpi > for bilevel) would be sufficient for any paper-publishing need... Bigger files, though... Thanks, Peter -- Peter Billam www.pjb.com.au www.pjb.com.au/comp/contact.html
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-10 11:17 +0000
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-06-10 15:00 +0200
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2016-06-10 17:22 +0100
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-11 01:55 +0000
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 19:18 -0700
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2016-06-11 02:43 +0000
Re: PageSize v. BoundingBox jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:37 -0700
csiph-web