Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #16962
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | seq command terribly slow |
| Date | 2016-03-13 04:18 +0000 |
| Organization | none-at-all |
| Message-ID | <slrnne9qgo.5pk.spamtrap42@one.localnet> (permalink) |
Any ideas why the seq command is so terribly slow?
In order to test whether a new (well, used, but that's another
story) disk, I tried using seq to generate a non-repeating
pattern. After seeing seq consuming 100% CPU time and a very low
data rate being written to disk, I did some checking on a
few-years-old system with a Xeon W3680 running Debian 7/Wheezy.
This command shows about 15MB/s:
seq 1e12 | pv > /dev/null
This command shows about 600MB/s, ~40X faster with much lower
total CPU use:
yes '' | cat -n | tr -d ' \t' | head -c 1000000000000 | pv > /dev/null
Even this simple Python program shows about 12MB/s:
(indented for this posting)
first = 1.0
last = 1.0e12
increment = 1.0
i = first
while (last >= i):
print('%.0f' % i)
i += increment
Yes, the seq command has a lot of formatting options. They
should basically all be handled at initialization time and not
incur a significant CPU penalty in the main loop.
Any ideas why seq is to slow?
Thanks.
--
Robert Riches
spamtrap42@jacob21819.net
(Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
seq command terribly slow Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-03-13 04:18 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-03-13 12:24 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-03-13 16:42 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-03-14 14:22 +0100
Re: seq command terribly slow Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-03-15 02:38 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Gernot Fink <g.fink@gmx.net> - 2016-03-13 18:21 +0100
Re: seq command terribly slow Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-03-13 17:45 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2016-03-14 21:58 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-03-15 02:44 +0000
Re: seq command terribly slow Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2016-03-16 00:41 +0000
csiph-web