Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #9380
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
|---|---|
| From | Rob <nomail@example.com> |
| Subject | Re: Logs |
| References | (5 earlier) <kHXwx.242436$ad5.18579@fx06.am4> <70e693ef54.Broadband@tmsmith36.plus.com> <Ulgxx.140284$aP2.106628@fx38.am4> <slrnmsbe3b.aul.nomail@xs9.xs4all.nl> <j2jxx.216375$3n4.114441@fx35.am4> |
| Message-ID | <slrnmsbftu.aul.nomail@xs9.xs4all.nl> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-08 08:37 +0000 |
Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/08/15 09:06, Rob wrote: >> Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> dhcpcd5 is a DHCP client deamon. It handles the DHCP on your network >>> interfaces. Unlike previous clients it ignores the settings in >>> /etc/network/interfaces and just does its own thing. So if you set a >>> manual address in /etc/network/interfaces you get two addresses - one >>> from interfaces and one set by dhcp. >> >> But why did they make this change? The old dhclient worked, didn't it? > > Mostly, yes. I believe the isc-dchp-client that was used before had some > issues with IPv6 addresses. > > Using the new one is something to do with the choice of Wifi GUI tool. > It works ok if all you want to do is use a standard DHCP setup. Ah... I do recognize that! We have some immediate requirement and replace the working system with a newly written untested program, and without looking into other requirements than the writer has on his own system... >> There appears to be a tendency to replace old and trusted software from >> trusted developers by newfangled crap that more mimicks the behaviour >> and stability of Microsoft Windows, but why would "we" want to do that? > > I'm not keen on the idea of "That has been the standard method since > forever - let's get rid of it!" that seems to be going around. Notwork > Mangler was one example that I never got on with, but at least that made > a show of acknowledging the interfaces file. This new dhcp daemon > doesn't seem to even bother with that (I'm willing to believe that there > might be a way to configure it to work "properly" though) Another one is the new idea of moving the entire system into the init program (then called systemd), and in the process modify many other things that "systemd cannot handle". (instead of implement changes into it to overcome those shortcomings) Fortunately I still have a raspbian image from 2013 that I still use on all my new deployments, and from which things like ifplugd can still easily be removed.
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-04 19:15 +0100
Re: Logs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-04 19:49 +0100
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-04 23:33 +0100
Re: Logs JimR <NotReally@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-05 01:23 -0400
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-05 23:58 +0100
Re: Logs alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-08-06 19:36 +0000
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-06 21:51 +0100
Re: Logs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-06 22:07 +0100
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-06 23:24 +0100
Re: Logs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-06 23:40 +0100
Re: Logs Stefan Enzinger <mindoms@aon.at> - 2015-08-07 10:23 +0200
Re: Logs Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-08-07 13:51 +0000
Re: Logs Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-08-07 14:45 +0000
Re: Logs Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-08-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-07 21:10 +0100
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-07 22:14 +0100
Re: Logs Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2015-08-08 17:26 +0100
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-08 21:23 +0100
Re: Logs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-09 07:16 +0100
Re: Logs Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 06:21 +0100
Re: Logs Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-08-08 08:06 +0000
Re: Logs Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 09:25 +0100
Re: Logs Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-08-08 08:37 +0000
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-08 21:08 +0100
Re: Logs "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2015-08-09 08:36 +0200
Re: Logs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-09 16:02 +0100
Re: Logs Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:19 -0400
Re: Logs T M Smith <tmsmith36@tmsmith36.plus.com> - 2015-08-09 20:45 +0100
Re: Logs "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2015-08-17 17:44 +0200
Re: Logs Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2015-08-04 20:34 +0100
Re: Logs druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 20:38 +0100
Re: Logs mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2015-08-04 20:41 +0100
Re: Logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-08-05 08:16 +0000
Re: Logs Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-08-05 09:15 +0000
csiph-web