Re: array search part 2

From	"Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: array search part 2
Date	2013-11-18 11:08 -0600
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<slrnl8kicr.qs6.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> (permalink)
References	<93xuovoqvo59.1wcgm8i5gn2hb$.dlg@40tude.net> <181120131505521953%timstreater@greenbee.net> <1effhia2fnbeo$.1ts7of1q9m0f7.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:52 -0500, richard wrote:
> You thicker DOPE! IT MAKES NO FRICKIN DIFFERENCE!
> And the examples I have seen at php.net all use a single =.

It only doesn't make a difference when some other problem when some
other problem is *also* chewing on your butt. Just because it doesn't
yell "+++ OUT OF CHEESE ERROR % REDO FROM START" doesn't mean its
not a problem.

-- 
186,000 Miles per Second.  It's not just a good idea.  IT'S THE LAW.

Thread

array search part 2 richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 09:10 -0500
  Re: array search part 2 Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-18 15:32 +0100
    Re: array search part 2 richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 09:59 -0500
  Re: array search part 2 richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 09:31 -0500
  Re: array search part 2 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-11-18 15:05 +0000
    Re: array search part 2 richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 11:06 -0500
      Re: array search part 2 Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-18 17:17 +0100
      Re: array search part 2 "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-11-18 11:08 -0600
      Re: array search part 2 Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2013-11-19 03:11 +0000
      Re: array search part 2 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-11-19 09:27 +0100
    Re: array search part 2 Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-11-18 13:08 -0500
  Re: array search part 2 richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 11:11 -0500
    Re: array search part 2 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-11-18 19:10 +0100
      Re: array search part 2 Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-11-18 18:28 +0000
        Re: array search part 2 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-11-18 20:03 +0100
  solved  (was: array search part 2) richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-18 21:45 -0500
    Re: solved Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-11-19 13:50 +0000
      Re: solved Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-11-19 06:16 -0800
        Re: solved Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-11-19 16:29 +0000
          Re: solved Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-11-19 10:57 -0800
      Re: solved tony@mountifield.org (Tony Mountifield) - 2013-11-19 14:48 +0000
        Re: solved Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-19 16:12 +0100
        Re: solved Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-11-19 16:25 +0000
      Re: solved richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-19 11:51 -0500
        Re: solved Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-19 18:31 +0100
        Re: solved Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-11-19 18:15 +0000
    Re: solved Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-11-19 17:43 +0100
      Re: solved richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-11-19 14:41 -0500
        Re: solved "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-11-19 19:52 +0000
        Re: solved Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-11-20 16:02 +0100

csiph-web