Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #51192
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: The Death of 10.8? |
| Date | 2013-10-29 15:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnl6vlun.dqj.mr@irc.sandman.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <barmar-DFEBF4.05492829102013@news.eternal-september.org> <slrnl6v3ko.dca.mr@irc.sandman.net> <barmar-82FEC4.06521729102013@news.eternal-september.org> <slrnl6v83c.dgv.mr@irc.sandman.net> <barmar-B0D91B.10295229102013@news.eternal-september.org> |
In article <barmar-B0D91B.10295229102013@news.eternal-september.org>, Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > > > > > But isn't beta. And I personally disagree with that. Never had any > > > > > > problems with any 10.x.0 release. At least none that would make me > > > > > > consider it "beta". > > > > > > > > > > There's almost always a software update within a month or so of the > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > ...which doesn't make the first release "beta". > > > > > > What part of "effectively beta" or "beta-quality" are you trying > > > incredibly hard to avoid understanding? > > > > Huh? I wrote the top-quoted statement above, where I explained that I, > > personally, never have used a 10.x.0 version of OSX that I would ever call > > "beta-quality", where you responded with the fact that there usually is a > > point upgrade soon after release. > > Well, that's your opinion. As I clearly and unambiguously stated. > Many others usually wait for 10.x.1 before installing it, allowing you > and all the other early adopters to test it for them. Which doesn't make it "beta" either. > For instance, I've read that Mavericks has some issues with Smart > Folders in Mail disappearing after the upgrade. Not a critical failure, > but serious enough that many users will be inconvenienced. Hasn't happened to me, and wouldn't make it be "beta" either. There can be bugs in a 10.x.9 release as well. -- Sandman[.net]
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 14:08 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 15:53 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:12 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 16:48 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 16:55 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 16:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 17:33 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 10:10 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2013-10-28 16:14 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:39 +1300
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 14:23 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:54 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 14:50 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 19:56 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 15:11 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 18:10 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 07:49 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 05:49 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 10:25 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 06:52 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 11:41 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 10:29 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:38 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:36 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:33 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-29 08:47 -0500
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:45 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:32 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-29 09:57 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 07:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:50 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 08:58 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 16:03 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 23:36 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:32 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 18:11 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2013-10-28 12:19 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 19:59 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 16:22 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:53 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 21:55 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 22:53 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-28 18:58 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 23:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 19:13 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 16:32 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 16:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 20:04 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 22:45 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 23:26 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-29 18:14 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-28 23:59 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:50 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 10:53 +1300
csiph-web