Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #7768
| From | orcus@pwr.wroc.pl |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? |
| Date | 2013-04-05 03:43 +0000 |
| Organization | Politechnika Wroclawska |
| Message-ID | <slrnklsi2l.dl7.orcus@orcus.wcss.wroc.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <kji5s8$31t$5@dont-email.me> <kjkja8$952$1@dont-email.me> <87hajm9j5k.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2013-04-04, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Chris Glur writes: >> And if so I'm waiting for a comment on my observation >> that since the () could be a zilllion lines, it's a crappy >> syntax to have the 'initialisation' at the END. > > It is what it is. If you don’t like it, I suggest using some different > language with syntax more to your taste. Or put () in file, remove redirections and use exec to open fds. -- Pozdrawiam orcus
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-04-03 20:11 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2013-04-03 21:10 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-03 22:34 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-04 04:40 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-04-04 14:01 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-04-04 19:12 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-04 20:43 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2013-04-05 03:43 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:54 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-05 09:12 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-05 16:35 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-05 17:50 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2013-04-05 16:02 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:58 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:44 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:51 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Surinder <Surinder.Singh@example.net> - 2013-04-09 11:20 +0530
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2013-04-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2013-04-08 21:08 +0300
csiph-web