Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #663
| From | Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
| Subject | Re: PAR2 question |
| Date | 2011-12-25 23:16 +0000 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <slrnjffbm4.12ht.willem@turtle.stack.nl> (permalink) |
| References | <fb5b85b9-daae-4a0e-b375-de8fa57be53a@q9g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> |
Industrial One wrote:
) I am using Quickpar and have experimented by manually damaging a WAV
) file to test the limits of PAR2. Obviously, at some point it refuses
) to repair as it needs one more block. Why can it not just repair the
) damaged file as much as it can?
)
) It would be far more preferable to have 99% of the original song/video
) clip than only 80% because QuickPar bitches about the file being one
) bit too damaged for it to do anything.
Because that's how the underlying mathematics work.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PAR2 question Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-25 13:25 -0800
Re: PAR2 question Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2011-12-25 23:16 +0000
Re: PAR2 question Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-26 08:33 -0800
Re: PAR2 question Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 09:20 -0800
Re: PAR2 question Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-27 09:51 -0800
Re: PAR2 question Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-12-29 09:10 -0800
Re: PAR2 question Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-29 18:35 +0000
Re: PAR2 question "Captain Obvious" <udodenko@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-12-31 18:26 +0200
csiph-web