Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #17196

Re: return -1 using size_t???

Show all headers | View raw

On 2012-02-12, Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
> There is one that does both (selectable as an option).  I just happened
> to be reading a Unisys C manual[1] recently.  It's part of MCP: Unisys's
> OS that runs on big machines derived from a Burroughs architecture.  It
> has 48-bit words and 8-bit bytes.
>
>  sizeof char/unsigned char/signed char is 1
>  sizeof long double is 12
>  sizeof everything else is 6
>
> Despite having 48 bits, all integer types have 39 value bits.  Signed
> types have, in addition, a sign bit (presumably the 40th).  The
> remaining bits are presumably related to the tagged architecture that
> Burroughs machines have always had and, as far as C goes, will be
> padding bits.  These machine will definitely have trap-representations,
> since some sets of these tag bits are designed to cause traps in certain
> situations.

Having worked with these systems in the early 1980's, I remember
that integers are just floating point numbers where the 8-bit exponent
contains all zeroes, and the (1+39)-bit mantissa holds the value.
The four tag bits (3-bit tag plus 1-bit parity) are not visible to the
programmer. So the hardware actually uses 52-bit words.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

return -1 using size_t??? Robert Hayes <rhyes80@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 11:21 -0800
  Re: return -1 using size_t??? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 15:00 -0500
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-11 23:24 +0000
  Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jeffrey R <joeff@nospam.com> - 2012-02-11 19:58 +0000
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-11 15:11 -0500
  Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-11 15:07 -0500
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Robert Hayes <rhyes80@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 12:42 -0800
      Re: return -1 using size_t??? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-11 13:19 -0800
        Re: return -1 using size_t??? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-11 17:10 -0800
          Re: return -1 using size_t??? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-12 03:48 -0800
            Re: return -1 using size_t??? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-12 04:04 -0800
      Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jeffrey R <joeff@nospam.com> - 2012-02-11 22:25 +0000
        Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 14:36 -0800
          Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-11 23:17 +0000
        Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jeroen Mostert <jmostert@xs4all.nl> - 2012-02-11 23:46 +0100
          Re: return -1 using size_t??? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-11 19:18 -0500
        Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-12 08:38 -0500
      Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-11 23:32 +0000
      Re: return -1 using size_t??? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-11 19:15 -0500
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ralph Spitzner <rasp@spitzner.org> - 2012-02-13 13:51 +0100
  Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 12:40 -0800
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-11 17:02 -0500
      Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 14:11 -0800
        Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-11 17:21 -0500
          Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 14:31 -0800
            Re: return -1 using size_t??? Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-02-11 22:52 +0000
            Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-02-12 00:20 +0100
              Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-12 09:21 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-12 12:27 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jeroen Mostert <jmostert@xs4all.nl> - 2012-02-12 22:17 +0100
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-12 15:10 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-13 03:11 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-12 23:25 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jeroen Mostert <jmostert@xs4all.nl> - 2012-02-13 07:46 +0100
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-02-13 10:27 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-13 12:36 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-13 10:26 -0700
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-02-14 00:18 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-14 00:29 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-13 16:37 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-02-13 11:47 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-13 12:54 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-02-13 14:30 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-22 01:53 +0200
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-13 12:11 -0500
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-13 17:28 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-13 13:08 -0500
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-13 23:06 +0000
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-02-13 14:39 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-13 14:59 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-02-12 22:17 +0100
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-12 15:06 -0800
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-12 18:12 -0500
                Re: return -1 using size_t??? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-22 02:15 +0200
  Re: return -1 using size_t??? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-02-11 14:27 -0800
    Re: return -1 using size_t??? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-11 17:34 -0800

csiph-web