Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #172434

Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?

From Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?
Date 2016-09-19 12:10 +0200
Message-ID <sj3Gq-43G-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <siSBk-5tr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sj1bz-2rl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sj2U1-3y7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday 19 September 2016 10:18:15 Brian wrote:
> TTBOMK the installers (as .debs) are i386 only and there is no source
> code for a filter they contain. So the situation is really no better
> than at Samsung.

Except that Samsung has really good human back-up support for x86 at least!!

Lisi

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?  brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 00:20 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? rlharris@oplink.net - 2016-09-19 00:40 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 01:00 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-09-19 01:40 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 19:40 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 20:30 +0200
            Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 20:30 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 08:40 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? gianluca <gianlucarenzi@eurekelettronica.it> - 2016-09-19 09:30 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 11:20 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:10 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-19 01:10 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2016-09-19 02:00 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 08:30 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 10:50 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 10:40 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 12:00 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 12:20 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 15:50 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED Ralph Katz <ralph.katz@rcn.com> - 2016-09-22 01:20 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-22 10:30 +0200
            Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 12:30 +0200
              Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-09-22 13:00 +0200
                Laserjet p1109w - FIXED [back OT :)] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 13:50 +0200
                Re: Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 14:30 +0200
                Re: Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:20 +0200

csiph-web