Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. |
| Date | 2021-09-20 21:02 +0100 |
| Organization | Fix this later |
| Message-ID | <siapdc$lg7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <si9jk4$188$1@dont-email.me> <siakbv$j80$1@gioia.aioe.org> <siakmd$ilv$1@dont-email.me> <sial4s$ubm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 20/09/2021 19:50, Max wrote: > On 20.09.21 20:42, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 20/09/2021 19:36, Max wrote: >>> On 20.09.21 11:17, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>> lFcrdtwo,econ you itelt nx >>>> ook ohns af you sdinliofy >>>> ttie aegtrxtxmxuxex xoxexcxyt >>>> hhs tlxo?ixhx xsxdxtx xnxrxpx >>>> tFar eat apcrexim,tc t semr poexx >>>> hot cxnra prodita eua doceyctdion >>>> a-t sa.dxrxtxax xtxlxoxsx xsxIxcn >>>> t-ehtrxex xhxnxix xoxkx,xax x xax >>>> eAed danptns yenetxig >>>> vnr hop'e sah ro.hxnx >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> eI nhvtr siie aiyhhrn ui >>> teae. Nacd cnptei,gbltk >>> ht stteo. aey' olf lno >>> tie' hos eLst sta loullw >>> ook hhssglmc.dCwe!r han >>> fcr ttii aoek ohne sTMaxx >> >> >> Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner! >> > > That was fun. Thank you for this great idea. :-) SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your own. SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your own SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your ow SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your o SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on your SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on you SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on yo SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on y SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish on SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish o SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finish SPOILER: Read no further if you want to finis SPOILER: Read no further if you want to fini SPOILER: Read no further if you want to fin SPOILER: Read no further if you want to fi SPOILER: Read no further if you want to f SPOILER: Read no further if you want to SPOILER: Read no further if you want to SPOILER: Read no further if you want t SPOILER: Read no further if you want SPOILER: Read no further if you want SPOILER: Read no further if you wan SPOILER: Read no further if you wa SPOILER: Read no further if you w SPOILER: Read no further if you SPOILER: Read no further if you SPOILER: Read no further if yo SPOILER: Read no further if y SPOILER: Read no further if SPOILER: Read no further if SPOILER: Read no further i SPOILER: Read no further SPOILER: Read no further SPOILER: Read no furthe SPOILER: Read no furth SPOILER: Read no furt SPOILER: Read no fur SPOILER: Read no fu SPOILER: Read no f SPOILER: Read no SPOILER: Read no SPOILER: Read n SPOILER: Read SPOILER: Read SPOILER: Rea SPOILER: Re SPOILER: R SPOILER: SPOILER: SPOILER SPOILE SPOIL SPOI SPO SP S Encryption: Read a PAIR of lines from input. If one is shorter, pad it with 'x's. If the lines are an odd number of characters long, add an 'x' to each. You now have your input: ABCDEFGHIJKL MNOPQRSTUVWx Think of it as squares of 2x2 characters: AB CD EF GH IJ KL MN OP QR ST UV Wx Rotate each square 90 deg clockwise: MA OC QE SG UI WK NB PD RF TH VJ xL That's the whole thing. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 10:17 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 07:00 -0700
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 15:17 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 10:52 -0700
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 19:10 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-20 20:36 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 19:42 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-20 20:50 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 21:02 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-20 22:24 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-20 22:08 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 21:43 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-20 21:50 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-09-21 17:00 +0300
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-21 15:22 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-21 23:31 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-21 23:03 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-22 00:22 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 13:29 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-09-26 14:39 +0300
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 15:07 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-21 15:18 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-09-21 21:43 +0300
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-21 20:41 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 02:24 +0200
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-25 05:24 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 13:56 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-25 14:21 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-25 14:28 +0100
Re: CHATX - a thread starter that's not as easy as it looks. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 16:11 +0200
csiph-web