Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #172390
| From | Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: xaralx package |
| Date | 2016-09-18 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <siLJw-W8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <siL6N-IX-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <siL6N-IX-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <siL6N-IX-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <siL6N-IX-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <siL6N-IX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Op 18-09-16 om 16:16 schreef Michael Fothergill: > I tried using gdebi to install xaralx deb file. The error I get seems > to suggest I need a newer version of the libjpeg package than I > currently have...... > > See here: > > root@rhinoceros:/home/mikef/Documents/xaralx# gdebi > xaralx_0.7r1785-7_amd64.deb > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Building data structures... Done > Building data structures... Done > This package is uninstallable > Dependency is not satisfiable: libjpeg8 (>= 8c) > > I am a bit puzzled here.... If this version of xaralx was abandoned in > 2014 surely gdebi would be asking me to install older versions of > dependent packages rather then bang up to date ones? The libjpeg8 package has been in and out of Testing several times since early 2015. It was removed just before Jessie went stable, so it ended up missing: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libjpeg8 My current Testing setup started years ago, so the last/latest version of that package (8d1-2) is still installed. It doesn't cause any problems here. I'm not sure exactly why it was removed from Testing (no time to investigate at present - sorry), but it could have something to do with libjpeg/libjpeg-turbo conflicts. You could pick it up from the snapshot archive as well and try to install it manually (http://snapshot.debian.org/package/libjpeg8/8d1-2/#libjpeg8_8d1-2). Don't proceed if doing that causes lots of other packages to be removed, though. Regards, Frank
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 09:10 +0200
Re: xaralx package Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:00 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:40 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:30 +0200
Re: xaralx package Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> - 2016-09-15 17:00 +0200
Re: xaralx package Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-09-15 17:00 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 17:20 +0200
Re: xaralx package Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-09-15 17:30 +0200
Re: xaralx package "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-09-15 17:50 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 18:10 +0200
Re: xaralx package Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-09-15 18:20 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 18:50 +0200
Re: xaralx package Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2016-09-15 19:20 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:40 +0200
Re: xaralx package Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2016-09-15 20:10 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-18 16:20 +0200
Re: xaralx package Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2016-09-18 17:00 +0200
Re: xaralx package "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-09-15 18:50 +0200
Re: xaralx package Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-15 17:20 +0200
csiph-web